Impact of attenuation correction of radiotherapy hardware for positron emission tomography‐magnetic resonance in ano‐rectal radiotherapy patients
Abstract: BackgroundPositron Emission Tomography‐Magnetic Resonance (PET‐MR) scanners could improve ano‐rectal radiotherapy planning through improved Gross Tumour Volume (GTV) delineation and enabling dose painting strategies using metabolic measurements. This requires accurate quantitative PET images acquired in the radiotherapy treatment position.PurposeThis study aimed to evaluate the impact on GTV delineation and metabolic parameter measurement of using novel Attenuation Correction (AC) maps that included the radiot… Show more
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Cited by 1 publication
References 28 publications
Evaluating a radiotherapy deep learning synthetic CT algorithm for PET-MR attenuation correction in the pelvis
Background Positron emission tomography–magnetic resonance (PET-MR) attenuation correction is challenging because the MR signal does not represent tissue density and conventional MR sequences cannot image bone. A novel zero echo time (ZTE) MR sequence has been previously developed which generates signal from cortical bone with images acquired in 65 s. This has been combined with a deep learning model to generate a synthetic computed tomography (sCT) for MR-only radiotherapy. This study aimed to evaluate this algorithm for PET-MR attenuation correction in the pelvis. Methods Ten patients being treated with ano-rectal radiotherapy received a $$^{18}$$ 18 F-FDG-PET-MR in the radiotherapy position. Attenuation maps were generated from ZTE-based sCT (sCTAC) and the standard vendor-supplied MRAC. The radiotherapy planning CT scan was rigidly registered and cropped to generate a gold standard attenuation map (CTAC). PET images were reconstructed using each attenuation map and compared for standard uptake value (SUV) measurement, automatic thresholded gross tumour volume (GTV) delineation and GTV metabolic parameter measurement. The last was assessed for clinical equivalence to CTAC using two one-sided paired t tests with a significance level corrected for multiple testing of $$p \le 0.05/7 = 0.007$$ p ≤ 0.05 / 7 = 0.007 . Equivalence margins of $$\pm 3.5\%$$ ± 3.5 % were used. Results Mean whole-image SUV differences were −0.02% (sCTAC) compared to −3.0% (MRAC), with larger differences in the bone regions (−0.5% to −16.3%). There was no difference in thresholded GTVs, with Dice similarity coefficients $$\ge 0.987$$ ≥ 0.987 . However, there were larger differences in GTV metabolic parameters. Mean differences to CTAC in $${\mathrm {SUV}}_{\max}$$ SUV max were $$1.0 \pm 0.8\%$$ 1.0 ± 0.8 % (± standard error, sCTAC) and $$-4.6 \pm 0.9\%$$ - 4.6 ± 0.9 % (MRAC), and $$1.0 \pm 0.7\%$$ 1.0 ± 0.7 % (sCTAC) and $$-4.3 \pm 0.8\%$$ - 4.3 ± 0.8 % (MRAC) in $${\mathrm {SUV}}_{\rm mean}$$ SUV mean . The sCTAC was statistically equivalent to CTAC within a $$\pm 3.5\%$$ ± 3.5 % equivalence margin for $${\mathrm {SUV}}_{\max}$$ SUV max and $${\mathrm {SUV}}_{\rm mean}$$ SUV mean ($$p = 0.007$$ p = 0.007 and $$p = 0.002$$ p = 0.002 ), whereas the MRAC was not ($$p = 0.88$$ p = 0.88 and $$p = 0.83$$ p = 0.83 ). Conclusion Attenuation correction using this radiotherapy ZTE-based sCT algorithm was substantially more accurate than current MRAC methods with only a 40 s increase in MR acquisition time. This did not impact tumour delineation but did significantly improve the accuracy of whole-image and tumour SUV measurements, which were clinically equivalent to CTAC. This suggests PET images reconstructed with sCTAC would enable accurate quantitative PET images to be acquired on a PET-MR scanner.
Evaluating a radiotherapy deep learning synthetic CT algorithm for PET-MR attenuation correction in the pelvis
Background Positron emission tomography–magnetic resonance (PET-MR) attenuation correction is challenging because the MR signal does not represent tissue density and conventional MR sequences cannot image bone. A novel zero echo time (ZTE) MR sequence has been previously developed which generates signal from cortical bone with images acquired in 65 s. This has been combined with a deep learning model to generate a synthetic computed tomography (sCT) for MR-only radiotherapy. This study aimed to evaluate this algorithm for PET-MR attenuation correction in the pelvis. Methods Ten patients being treated with ano-rectal radiotherapy received a $$^{18}$$ 18 F-FDG-PET-MR in the radiotherapy position. Attenuation maps were generated from ZTE-based sCT (sCTAC) and the standard vendor-supplied MRAC. The radiotherapy planning CT scan was rigidly registered and cropped to generate a gold standard attenuation map (CTAC). PET images were reconstructed using each attenuation map and compared for standard uptake value (SUV) measurement, automatic thresholded gross tumour volume (GTV) delineation and GTV metabolic parameter measurement. The last was assessed for clinical equivalence to CTAC using two one-sided paired t tests with a significance level corrected for multiple testing of $$p \le 0.05/7 = 0.007$$ p ≤ 0.05 / 7 = 0.007 . Equivalence margins of $$\pm 3.5\%$$ ± 3.5 % were used. Results Mean whole-image SUV differences were −0.02% (sCTAC) compared to −3.0% (MRAC), with larger differences in the bone regions (−0.5% to −16.3%). There was no difference in thresholded GTVs, with Dice similarity coefficients $$\ge 0.987$$ ≥ 0.987 . However, there were larger differences in GTV metabolic parameters. Mean differences to CTAC in $${\mathrm {SUV}}_{\max}$$ SUV max were $$1.0 \pm 0.8\%$$ 1.0 ± 0.8 % (± standard error, sCTAC) and $$-4.6 \pm 0.9\%$$ - 4.6 ± 0.9 % (MRAC), and $$1.0 \pm 0.7\%$$ 1.0 ± 0.7 % (sCTAC) and $$-4.3 \pm 0.8\%$$ - 4.3 ± 0.8 % (MRAC) in $${\mathrm {SUV}}_{\rm mean}$$ SUV mean . The sCTAC was statistically equivalent to CTAC within a $$\pm 3.5\%$$ ± 3.5 % equivalence margin for $${\mathrm {SUV}}_{\max}$$ SUV max and $${\mathrm {SUV}}_{\rm mean}$$ SUV mean ($$p = 0.007$$ p = 0.007 and $$p = 0.002$$ p = 0.002 ), whereas the MRAC was not ($$p = 0.88$$ p = 0.88 and $$p = 0.83$$ p = 0.83 ). Conclusion Attenuation correction using this radiotherapy ZTE-based sCT algorithm was substantially more accurate than current MRAC methods with only a 40 s increase in MR acquisition time. This did not impact tumour delineation but did significantly improve the accuracy of whole-image and tumour SUV measurements, which were clinically equivalent to CTAC. This suggests PET images reconstructed with sCTAC would enable accurate quantitative PET images to be acquired on a PET-MR scanner.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
Contact Info
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Product
Resources
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.
