2020
DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000022195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of atrial fibrillation on outcomes of patients treated by transcatheter mitral valve repair

Abstract: Background: Conflicting data have been reported related to the impact of atrial fibrillation (AF) on outcomes after transcatheter mitral valve repair with MitraClip (MC) implantation. In this study, we assessed the prognosis of MC-treated patients according to the presence of pre-existing AF. Methods: Randomized and observational studies reporting outcomes of pre-existing AF or sinus rhythm in patients undergoing MC treatment were identified with an electronic search. O… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Underlining the otherwise comparability of the studied cohort, largely similar results were achieved regarding MR etiology, procedural characteristics, technical success, MR reduction and periprocedural MACCE. The already growing evidence of an adverse outcome of AF compared to non-AF patients, as reported for example by the groups of Velu, Keßler and Arora or by two recent meta-analyzes, were, thus, confirmed [5,6,8,14,15]. This, again, highlights the urgent need for additional strategies to improve the prognosis of this important and further growing cohort of patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Underlining the otherwise comparability of the studied cohort, largely similar results were achieved regarding MR etiology, procedural characteristics, technical success, MR reduction and periprocedural MACCE. The already growing evidence of an adverse outcome of AF compared to non-AF patients, as reported for example by the groups of Velu, Keßler and Arora or by two recent meta-analyzes, were, thus, confirmed [5,6,8,14,15]. This, again, highlights the urgent need for additional strategies to improve the prognosis of this important and further growing cohort of patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…In most cases, severe MR may not be treated due to the degree of sever ity, age, and co-morbid of the patients, and [5] complications of the surgical procedure. In such cases, mitraclip implantation is an established treatment option and plays an important role as it is a minimally invasive [2,6] procedure. It is also noted to have lesser complication rates [7] according to a study done by nickenig G et al Few other studies mentioned that atrial fibrillation (AF) is noted to be [3,5,8,9] one of the complications post mitraclip implantation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transcatheter mitral valve repair Similar to its impact on MV surgery, pre-operative atrial fibrillation has also been associated with adverse long-term outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter MV repair via MitraClip but with conflicting results on short-term outcomes such as in-hospital mortality, in-hospital complications and resource utilization [85][86][87][88][89][90] . One study reported greater in-hospital ischemic stroke, in-hospital hemorrhagic stroke, length of hospitalization, and increased 30-day mortality in patients with pre-operative atrial fibrillation undergoing repair with MitraClip compared to those without pre-operative atrial fibrillation.…”
Section: Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, both groups had a similar rate of stroke at 30day [89] . Although studies conflict on short-term outcomes, many report pre-operative atrial fibrillation as an independent predictor of 1-year mortality [86,87] and 3-year mortality with increased MACCE [91] . A multicenter study with 5-year follow-up also showed an association between atrial fibrillation and reduced long-term survival in patients with MitraClip repair but showed no difference in stroke incidence [92] .…”
Section: Mmentioning
confidence: 99%