Impact of anxiety levels on the perception of pain in patients undergoing office hysteroscopy

Abstract

Objective This study aimed at assessing the impact of anxiety on pain perception during hysteroscopy and to highlight the possible contribution of factors related to pain perception. Materials and methods 104 women with indication for office hysteroscopy fullfilled anonymous self-report questionnaires during the waiting time, before the procedure. The first self-report questionnaire included general patient information and an overall assessment of the degree of satisfaction with the information received before the procedure. The level of pre-procedural anxiety was measured through the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory STAI-Y1 (state anxiety). The perceived stress was assessed using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). The intensity of pain during the procedure and 20 min later was assessed with VAS score. Results The average waiting time was of 192.33 ± 91 min. 59 patients (56.7%) performed the examination without analgesia while 45 women (43.3%) required analgesia. 28 women (27%) experienced mild pain, 34 (33%) moderate pain and 42 (40%) severe pain. The patients who performed the procedure without analgosedation had an average STAI-Y1 score of 44.81 ± 1.20, compared to women who required analgosedation (average score of 49.40 ± 1.64). The perceived level of stress was also associated with the use of analgosedation. Patients who did not request any anesthetic intervention obtained a PSS average score of 16.66 ± 0.75, compared to the subgroup with anesthesia (score of 19.76 ± 0.90). Conclusions Anxiety represents a key element for the success of ambulatory hysteroscopy. The management of anxiety can reduce the request for analgesia with a consequent optimization of time, costs and safety.

Diagnostic accuracy of hysteroscopy vs dilation and curettage (D&C) for atypical endometrial hyperplasia in patients performing hysterectomy or serial follow-up

“…Hysteroscopy enables direct visualization and controlled operator movements with a lower risk of perforation, as no sounding or cervical dilatation is performed [44]. Moreover, it is most of the time a well-tolerated procedure, thus avoiding general anesthesia, and decreasing the costs [45].…”

Oil-based versus water-based contrast media for hysterosalpingography in infertile women of advanced age, with ovulation disorders or a high risk for tubal pathology: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial (H2Oil2 study)

“…These result support the first hypothesis that when using oil-based contrast medium, the pain was caused by an increase in intrauterine pressure prior to dislodgment of pregnancy-hindering debris from the proximal part of otherwise anatomically normal Fallopian tubes [ 42 ]. Previous research associated pre-procedural anxiety to a higher experienced pain level during medical procedures [ 19 , 43 ]. To further investigate the relationship between discomfort or pain during HSG and ongoing pregnancies in the current study, the APAIS questionnaire will be used to score pre-procedural anxiety as a confounder for experienced pain.…”

Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Treated by Artery Embolization Combined with Diode Laser: A Novel Approach for a Rare Disease

“…Moreover it is most of the time a well-tolerated procedure, thus avoiding general anesthesia, and decreasing the costs [ 35 ]. Hemostasis can be achieved with electro-coagulation using a wire-loop or roller-ball [ 36 , 37 ].…”