The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11629-017-4713-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of anthropogenic disturbance on species diversity and vegetation structure of a lowland tropical rainforest of eastern Himalaya, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
4
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shannon diversity in different forests ranged from 1.21 to 2.66 in tropical, 0.28-2.65 in subtropical, and 1.93-2.56 in temperate forests. These values are well within the range reported by Nayak and Sahoo (2020), who found 1.59-2.56 in ten different tropical forest stands of the state of Odisha in India, while in Northeast India, the lowland rainforests showed tree diversity from 2.44 to 3.46 (Gogoi et al, 2018). In dry deciduous forests of central India, tree diversity values reported were 0.77-2.53 (Dar et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussion Tree Diversity In Different Land Usessupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Shannon diversity in different forests ranged from 1.21 to 2.66 in tropical, 0.28-2.65 in subtropical, and 1.93-2.56 in temperate forests. These values are well within the range reported by Nayak and Sahoo (2020), who found 1.59-2.56 in ten different tropical forest stands of the state of Odisha in India, while in Northeast India, the lowland rainforests showed tree diversity from 2.44 to 3.46 (Gogoi et al, 2018). In dry deciduous forests of central India, tree diversity values reported were 0.77-2.53 (Dar et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussion Tree Diversity In Different Land Usessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Higher tree species richness indicates a more stable ecosystem and may demonstrate a better ecosystem/carbon service (Ives et al, 2001). Earlier reports from a similar geographical area suggest management practices and other human-induced disturbances such as small-scale mining, forest encroachment for agricultural expansion, fuelwood, and different non-timber forest product extraction influence tree richness and densities (Gogoi et al, 2018). Additionally, varying community structure, composition, topography, elevation, soil properties, and other microclimatic conditions also influence the tree-based ecosystems' structural and functional attributes (Nath et al, 2018;Kurmi et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussion Tree Diversity In Different Land Usesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Broadly, we assumed the widely reported climatic variables, namely, precipitation, temperature, and their interaction, as the prime factor for varied richness along the altitudinal gradient of the Himalayan system [46,55,56]. Another crucial factor could be anthropogenic disturbance and its intensity [27,38]. Future research could explore these variables to explain the difference in richness recorded in our study.…”
Section: Tree Species Richness and Diversitymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Studies in the Eastern Himalayan forests outside of India were mainly carried out in Nepal [25,26], Bhutan [27][28][29], and China [30,31] to assess forest structure and composition. Within the Indian part of the Eastern Himalayas, studies were carried out in Arunachal Pradesh [32][33][34], Meghalaya [8,35,36], Darjeeling, West Bengal [37], and Assam [38,39]. The majority of these studies presented the structure and composition of different forests along altitudinal gradients with varying intensities of anthropogenic disturbance.…”
Section: Past Studies In the Eastern Himalayasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SP forest also had the lowest AGC compared to the other 2 sites, especially in the biggest dbh class (Figure 2D-E). Generally, the AGC increased according to the number of big trees and dbh class increases (Gogoi and Sahoo 2018;Mildrexler et al 2020;Shirima et al 2015). In the SP forest, basal area and AGC increased in the first to middle range of the dbh class but became lowest in the biggest dbh class (≥24 cm).…”
Section: Size Class Distributionmentioning
confidence: 94%