2016
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.26673
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of analysis interval size on the quality of optical frequency domain imaging assessments of stent implantation for lesions of the superficial femoral artery

Abstract: Using large intervals in OFDI analyses of SFA lesions resulted in few differences in measurement variability of volumetric parameters. However, planar analysis for MLA assessment can be susceptible to high variability when large intervals are applied. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cross-sectional OCT images were analyzed at 5.0-mm intervals for quantitative and qualitative evaluations. 6 Quantitative and qualitative assessments were performed with the OCT off-line analysis software (LightLab Imaging Inc, Westford, MA, USA). The stent and lumen areas were manually traced, and the neointimal thickness (NIT) was semiautomatically measured.…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cross-sectional OCT images were analyzed at 5.0-mm intervals for quantitative and qualitative evaluations. 6 Quantitative and qualitative assessments were performed with the OCT off-line analysis software (LightLab Imaging Inc, Westford, MA, USA). The stent and lumen areas were manually traced, and the neointimal thickness (NIT) was semiautomatically measured.…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cross-sectional OCT imaging frames were reviewed at axial 5-mm intervals (every 20 frames) throughout the entire target segment. 13 Lumen and stent borders were manually traced, and lumen and stent volumes were obtained using volumetric analysis. Neointimal area was calculated as stent area minus lumen area.…”
Section: Evt Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peri-stented segment was defined as 10 mm proximal or distal to the stented segment. Cross-sectional OFDI imaging frames were reviewed at axial 5 mm intervals (every 20 frame) throughout the entire target segment [13]. All imaging frames were initially screened for quality assessment and excluded from analysis if any portion of the stent was out of the screen or if the image had poor quality caused by residual blood, artifact, or reverberation [14].…”
Section: Ofdi Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%