2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.04.067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of an antimicrobial stewardship intervention on urinary tract infection treatment in the ED

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
4
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
25
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Just 5.6% of studies were focused on perioperative prophylaxis, 16.8% on EDs, 37.4% on outpatient settings, and 6.5% on parental education activities. It is notable that results from the Weddle et al study based on education intervention for prescribers in the ED [145] showing a 2% decrease in inappropriate antimicrobial prescribing were consistent with results from a study in the USA based on an adult population, which showed increased consistency of therapy choice from 44.8 to 83% [159]. ASPs implemented in outpatient settings, mainly involving audit and feedback and education, also seemed effective in reducing antimicrobial prescriptions.…”
Section: Main Findingssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Just 5.6% of studies were focused on perioperative prophylaxis, 16.8% on EDs, 37.4% on outpatient settings, and 6.5% on parental education activities. It is notable that results from the Weddle et al study based on education intervention for prescribers in the ED [145] showing a 2% decrease in inappropriate antimicrobial prescribing were consistent with results from a study in the USA based on an adult population, which showed increased consistency of therapy choice from 44.8 to 83% [159]. ASPs implemented in outpatient settings, mainly involving audit and feedback and education, also seemed effective in reducing antimicrobial prescriptions.…”
Section: Main Findingssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…It is disappointing, however, that adherence with the guidelines did not improve during the intervention period in the present study, which is in contrast with other intervention studies aimed at improving antibiotic prescription, including the previous Dutch checklist study (Hecker et al, 2014;Percival et al, 2015;Popovski et al, 2015;Guanche Garcell et al, 2011). The main difference between these previous studies and the present study is that improvement in adherence with the guidelines was actually one of seven aims in the present study, while others focused only on the antibiotic prescription (Hecker et al, 2014;Percival et al, 2015;Popovski et al, 2015;Guanche Garcell et al, 2011). Obviously the Dutch checklist study also aimed to improve performance on the seven checklist items, but an important difference is the lack of an easily accessible digital version of the guidelines on Aruba, 8 (5.4) 9 (8.2) 2 (5.7) 2 (7.1) 13 (7.5) 5 2 (1.3) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 6 1 (0.7) 3 (2.7) 1 (2.9) 0 (0) 4 (2.3) !7…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…For example, an observational study in a teaching hospital in Brazil concluded that 65.4% of the parenteral antimicrobial prescriptions were appropriate according to the local guidelines (Kawanami and Fortaleza, 2011). It is disappointing, however, that adherence with the guidelines did not improve during the intervention period in the present study, which is in contrast with other intervention studies aimed at improving antibiotic prescription, including the previous Dutch checklist study (Hecker et al, 2014;Percival et al, 2015;Popovski et al, 2015;Guanche Garcell et al, 2011). The main difference between these previous studies and the present study is that improvement in adherence with the guidelines was actually one of seven aims in the present study, while others focused only on the antibiotic prescription (Hecker et al, 2014;Percival et al, 2015;Popovski et al, 2015;Guanche Garcell et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 81%
“…[6][7][8] Consequently, multiple organizations and societies have emphasized the need for antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) in the ED. 9 In the inpatient settings, ASPs have reduced unnecessary antibiotic use by as much as 36%, [10][11][12][13] and produced institutional cost savings of up to $900,000 per year. 14 Failure to implement ASPs in EDs has been, in large part, the result of challenges unique to this setting and failure to consider clinical context during implementation.…”
Section: Background and Significancementioning
confidence: 99%