The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2017
DOI: 10.3141/2630-10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Alternative Project Delivery Systems on the International Roughness Index: Case Studies of Transportation Projects in the Western United States

Abstract: The impact of alternative project delivery methods (APDM) was compared with that of the traditional method of design–bid–build (DBB) on the long-term performance of transportation projects. The metric used to quantify long-term performance differences between projects is the international roughness index (IRI), which is an indicator of ride quality. Data were collected on four alternative delivery projects on the National Highway System in Arizona and Colorado, along with data on their comparable DBB projects.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…El Asmar et al [25,206] show that the average building quality increases significantly, and stakeholder communication (through requests for information and change order processing times) can be up to four times faster; the authors then mapped the level of integration of major delivery methods versus overall project performance, showing that more integration in the process leads to increasingly higher project performance. There is new preliminary evidence that suggests the actual performance of the facility itself, over its lifecycle, may improve too [207,208].…”
Section: Project Delivery Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El Asmar et al [25,206] show that the average building quality increases significantly, and stakeholder communication (through requests for information and change order processing times) can be up to four times faster; the authors then mapped the level of integration of major delivery methods versus overall project performance, showing that more integration in the process leads to increasingly higher project performance. There is new preliminary evidence that suggests the actual performance of the facility itself, over its lifecycle, may improve too [207,208].…”
Section: Project Delivery Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on previous achievements, Chen [12] firstly used the DEA-BND (Data Envelopment Analysis-Bound Variable) model to test and correct the indicator value, and then fed the obtained data to the ANN model for training purposes, and finally obtained the performance of the target project with a reasonable project delivery method. Touran et al [13] and Abkarian et al [14] regarded the traditional project delivery method (DBB) as a reference and considered other project delivery methods (DB, CM-at-risk, etc.) as alternatives.…”
Section: Decision-making Methods For Project Transaction Modementioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the recovery phase, the alternative project delivery methods (APDM) provide an opportunity to incorporate prevention and preparedness into the response and recovery phase, as part of efforts to 'build back better' (Abkarian et al, 2017). Such a method enables the practitioners of the recovery phase to move forward in terms of future resilience and risk management.…”
Section: Infrastructure Asset Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%