2022
DOI: 10.1097/mpg.0000000000003592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation on Nutritional Status and Intake in Children

Abstract: Objectives: This study aimed to describe the impact of allogeneic/haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation on nutritional status and intake in a group of children aged 2 to 18 years. Methods: In an observational study, data were collected prospectively. Patients were prescribed individual nutritional support by hospital routines. Anthropometrics were measured pre-transplant at hospital admission and weekly from the day of transplant (day 0) until day +28. z scores for weight, height, and BMI were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 66 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, the implementation of this approach is not being executed uniformly in the pediatric BMT population, despite some evidence of its benefits, including decreased length of stay and lower costs [ 22 , 48 ]. In a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial comparing EN versus PN use in critically-ill adults, minimal differences in outcomes were seen between groups, except for higher costs with PN [ 49 ]. By contrast, EN use in combination with PN contributed to improved patient outcomes in other studies, highlighting the potential benefits of continuing EN at any volume possible to maintain a diverse gut microbiota [ 22 , 50 , 51 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the implementation of this approach is not being executed uniformly in the pediatric BMT population, despite some evidence of its benefits, including decreased length of stay and lower costs [ 22 , 48 ]. In a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial comparing EN versus PN use in critically-ill adults, minimal differences in outcomes were seen between groups, except for higher costs with PN [ 49 ]. By contrast, EN use in combination with PN contributed to improved patient outcomes in other studies, highlighting the potential benefits of continuing EN at any volume possible to maintain a diverse gut microbiota [ 22 , 50 , 51 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%