2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.01.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of alcohol-impregnated port protectors and needleless neutral pressure connectors on central line–associated bloodstream infections and contamination of blood cultures in an inpatient oncology unit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
1
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
46
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…7,24 Unlike our study, in which no significant decrease in the HA-CLABSI rate among general oncology patients was observed, Sweet et al 24 found a decrease in the CLABSI rate from 2.3 to 0.3 infections per 1,000 catheter days after introduction of CVC disinfection caps. They reported a simultaneous intervention during the study period to replace the connector previously in use with a neutral-pressure device to accommodate the size of the disinfection cap.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…7,24 Unlike our study, in which no significant decrease in the HA-CLABSI rate among general oncology patients was observed, Sweet et al 24 found a decrease in the CLABSI rate from 2.3 to 0.3 infections per 1,000 catheter days after introduction of CVC disinfection caps. They reported a simultaneous intervention during the study period to replace the connector previously in use with a neutral-pressure device to accommodate the size of the disinfection cap.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…1 There is conflicting opinion regarding whether a 5-second alcohol scrub of needleless IV access device ports is sufficient. 20 There are also limited published data on the efficacy of silver impregnated/coated needleless IV access devices. Indeed, overall there was no significant difference between the median number of CFU recovered following a 5-and 15-second decontamination regimen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a retrospective study investigating the introduction of disinfection cap, CLABSI rates dropped from 1.682/1000 catheter days to 0.6461/1000 catheter days after implementing disinfection caps, achieving statistical significance[41]. In an observational study in an oncology unit, a total of 3,005 catheter-days and 1 CLABSI (0.3 infections/1,000 catheter-days) were documented during an intervention period where alcohol-impregnated port-protectors were introduced, compared with 6,851 catheter-days and 16 CLABSIs (2.3 infections/1,000 catheter-days) during the control period (RR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.02–1.07; p = .03)[42]. As an effective antiseptic method that does not rely on active human intervention, disinfection caps are an attractive way to complement a comprehensive CLABSI reduction strategy.…”
Section: Closed Icu Vs Open Icumentioning
confidence: 99%