Impact of Alarm Fatigue on the Work of Nurses in an Intensive Care Environment—A Systematic Review

Abstract

Background: In conditions of intensive therapy, where the patients treated are in a critical condition, alarms are omnipresent. Nurses, as they spend most of their time with patients, monitoring their condition 24 h, are particularly exposed to so-called alarm fatigue. The purpose of this study is to review the literature available on the perception of clinical alarms by nursing personnel and its impact on work in the ICU environment. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was carried out according to the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) protocol. The content of electronic databases was searched through, i.e., PubMed, OVID, EBSCO, ProQuest Nursery, and Cochrane Library. The keywords used in the search included: “intensive care unit,” “nurse,” “alarm fatigue,” “workload,” and “clinical alarm.” The review also covered studies carried out among nurses employed at an adult intensive care unit. Finally, seven publications were taken into consideration. Data were analyzed both descriptively and quantitatively, calculating a weighted average for specific synthetized data. Results: In the analyzed studies, 389 nurses were tested, working in different intensive care units. Two studies were based on a quality model, while the other five described the problem of alarms in terms of quantity, based on the HTF (Healthcare Technology Foundation) questionnaire. Intensive care nurses think that alarms are burdensome and too frequent, interfering with caring for patients and causing reduced trust in alarm systems. They feel overburdened with an excessive amount of duties and a continuous wave of alarms. Having to operate modern equipment, which is becoming more and more advanced, takes time that nurses would prefer to dedicate to their patients. There is no clear system for managing the alarms of monitoring devices. Conclusion: Alarm fatigue may have serious consequences, both for patients and for nursing personnel. It is necessary to introduce a strategy of alarm management and for measuring the alarm fatigue level.

Nurses’ experiences of providing care to patients with COVID-19 in the ICU in Wuhan: a descriptive phenomenological research

“…Alarms due to unfamiliar with ECMOs, along with alarms from other equipment, did arise alarm fatigue among ICU nurses. 22 All of these may increase nurses’ workload and, physical and emotional distress. 11 …”

“…Alarm fatigue is also a recourse of nurses’ stress response, studies are needed to develop precise PPE to decrease alarm fatigue among ICU nurses. 22 Further studies could also explore how to efficiently reallocate nursing resources to respond to pandemics or other infectious diseases. Longitudinal studies following up the patients and their families may also help address their unmet needs in ICU to help further improve the care provided by ICU nurses.…”

Impact of Hospital Nurses’ Perception on Clinical Alarms and Patient Safety Culture on Alarm Management Practice

“…In addition, a high volume of clinical alarm signals that are false or insignificant can result in medical staff taking inappropriate actions such as ignoring the alarm signals [ 12 , 13 ]. Excessive clinical alarms can lead to alarm fatigue, a condition wherein healthcare professionals become desensitized by a high frequency of false alarms and alarms’ sounds, resulting in negative patient outcomes [ 14 , 15 ]. Considering that nurses are key healthcare professionals at patients’ bedsides, nurses are most exposed to numerous clinical alarms (the majority of which are false or nonactionable) [ 16 , 17 , 18 ].…”

Alarm Fatigue Questionnaire: Turkish Validity and Reliability Study

“…As a consequence of this, nurses might not only fall inadequate in responding to clinical alarms but also disable or mute alarms without checking. This creates an unsafe environment for patients [9][10][11] . "The American Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reported that, from 2002 to 2004, 237 deaths were caused by neglecting clinical alarms" 12 .…”