2018
DOI: 10.3390/atmos9090363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Air Mass Conditions and Aerosol Properties on Ice Nucleating Particle Concentrations at the High Altitude Research Station Jungfraujoch

Abstract: Ice nucleation is the source of primary ice crystals in mixed-phase clouds. Only a small fraction of aerosols called ice nucleating particles (INPs) catalyze ice formation, with their nature and origin remaining unclear. In this study, we investigate potential predictor parameters of meteorological conditions and aerosol properties for INP concentrations at mixed-phase cloud condition at 242 K. Measurements were conducted at the High Altitude Research Station Jungfraujoch (Switzerland, 3580 m a.s.l.), which is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
24
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
(79 reference statements)
5
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The reasons are two-fold; first the more active INP nucleate ice at warmer temperatures and are therefore removed earlier and lower in the 30 clouds (Stopelli et al, 2015) or second, due to the presence of INP in the boundary layer that are advected into the cloud due to orographic lifting or turbulence at the top of the boundary layer. Indeed, (Lacher et al, 2018b) saw an increase in INP concentrations during periods of boundary layer air at Jungfraujoch, albeit at much colder sampling conditions than measured in this study. In contrast to an altitude dependence observed at Fletschron and Pte.…”
Section: Altitude Dependencycontrasting
confidence: 47%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reasons are two-fold; first the more active INP nucleate ice at warmer temperatures and are therefore removed earlier and lower in the 30 clouds (Stopelli et al, 2015) or second, due to the presence of INP in the boundary layer that are advected into the cloud due to orographic lifting or turbulence at the top of the boundary layer. Indeed, (Lacher et al, 2018b) saw an increase in INP concentrations during periods of boundary layer air at Jungfraujoch, albeit at much colder sampling conditions than measured in this study. In contrast to an altitude dependence observed at Fletschron and Pte.…”
Section: Altitude Dependencycontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…Field measurements of INPs in the Swiss Alps are largely bound to the high-altitude research station 35 Jungfraujoch (Boose et al, 2016;Chou et al, 2011;Conen et al, 2012Conen et al, , 2017Ehrman et al, 2001;Farrington et al, 2016;Hammer et al, 2018;Lacher et al, 2017Lacher et al, , 2018aLacher et al, , 2018bLloyd et al, 2015;Meola et al, 2015;Mertes et al, 2007;Nillius et al, 2013;Stopelli et al, 2016Stopelli et al, , 2017 due to its typical free tropospheric conditions. As such, measurements of INPs in the free troposphere at Jungfraujoch should be representative of INP concentrations globally.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The glaciation temperature of a cloud further depends on the supersaturation within the cloud and is highly sensitive to updraft velocity (Korolev et al, 2017;Korolev and Isaac, 2003;Korolev, 2008). As ice crystal concentrations in clouds can be several orders of magnitude higher than INP concentrations (Wex et al, 2010), secondary ice processes can play an important role in the evolution of supercooled clouds (Beck et al, 2018;Hallett and Mossop, 1974;Lauber et al, 2018;Mignani et al, 2019;Petters and Wright, 2015). However, the process of ice multiplication is not fully understood, with multiplication factors ranging from 1 to multiple orders of magnitude Wang, 2013).…”
Section: Atmospheric Implications For Mixed-phase Cloud Glaciationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following sample preparation, a sterile, single-use syringe was used to draw 0.25 mL of the suspension, and 100 drops were pipetted onto the petrolatum-coated copper disc, creating an array of ∼ 2.5 µL aliquots. Drops were visually inspected for size; however, it is possible not all drops were the same exact volume, which could lead to a small level of uncertainty (Hader et al, 2014;Bigg, 1953;Langham and Mason, 1958;Creamean et al, 2018b). The copper disc was then placed on a thermoelectric cold plate (Aldrich ® ) and covered with a transparent plastic dome.…”
Section: Ice Nucleation Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%