2003
DOI: 10.1078/0171-2985-00222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of aging upon DBA/2J B cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The downregulation of these genes is consistent with the age‐related limited diversity of B‐cell antibody generation in old mice (Weksler and Szabo, 2000; Lu and Cerny, 2002). The downregulated expression of Ig genes probably also reflects aging‐related T‐cell hyporesponsiveness, resulting in a diminished response to retroviral superantigen as demonstrated in the DBA/2J mouse strain (Howell et al, 2003) and reduced secretion of the cytokines that promote Ig synthesis (Pawelec et al, 2001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The downregulation of these genes is consistent with the age‐related limited diversity of B‐cell antibody generation in old mice (Weksler and Szabo, 2000; Lu and Cerny, 2002). The downregulated expression of Ig genes probably also reflects aging‐related T‐cell hyporesponsiveness, resulting in a diminished response to retroviral superantigen as demonstrated in the DBA/2J mouse strain (Howell et al, 2003) and reduced secretion of the cytokines that promote Ig synthesis (Pawelec et al, 2001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SAMP1 strain exhibits a defect in T‐helper cell activity that has not been identified in SAMP8s. Studies in other murine strains indicated that MHC class II activity is reduced in SAMP1 mice (Haruna et al, 1995), MHC class II gene expression is reduced in senescent macrophages where it is not a result of overall impaired responsiveness to IFN‐γ (Herrero et al, 2002), and T lymphocytes from old mice respond less strongly to retroviral superantigen than do those of young mice (Howell et al, 2003). Regardless of the level of IFN‐γ production in the SAMP8s, dysregulation of IFN‐γ production or response in the SAMP‐Os is suggested by the downregulation of many IFN‐γ‐inducible genes in SAMP‐Os, including: the immune factors T‐cell specific GTPase (L38444; Carlow et al, 1998); macrophage‐specific genes allograft inflammatory factor 1 (D86382; Deininger et al, 2002), and monokine induced by γ‐interferon ( MIG ; (M34815; Farber, 1990); macropain ( LMP2 ; D44456), a catalytic subunit of the immunoproteasome that generates immunogenic peptides for presentation by MHC proteins (Goldberg et al, 2002; Yang, 2003); acute phase response factor (U08378; Raz et al, 1994); the antiinflammatory interleukin‐18 binding protein (AB019505; Mühl and Pfeilschifter, 2003); the MHC genes discussed above; the cellular proteins mGBP‐2 (AJ007970; Gorbacheva et al, 2002) and LRG‐47 (U19119; Carlow et al, 1998); and the enzymatic metabolism proteins interferon‐inducible GTPase ( IIGP ; AJ007971; Boehm et al, 1998) and GTPase IGTP (U53219; Taylor et al, 1996).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%