2018
DOI: 10.1161/jaha.117.007061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Aging on the Strength of Cardiovascular Risk Factors: A Longitudinal Study Over 40 Years

Abstract: BackgroundThe knowledge of the impact of cardiovascular risk factors at different ages has mainly been based on different studies performed at different ages. This study aimed to investigate the change in impact of traditional cardiovascular risk factors over the aging process in subjects followed for 4 decades.Methods and ResultsIn the ULSAM (Uppsala Longitudinal Study of Adult Men) study, 2322 men originally investigated in 1970 to 1974 have been followed regarding cardiovascular diseases until the end of 20… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
1
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
65
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The null findings in this study may possibly reflect that we studied a relatively healthy sample with overall well-controlled levels of BP and lipids. Our sample was also older (mean age 68 years); risk factor associations are generally attenuated in older compared to younger individuals [32]. Moreover, our results may also differ from prior studies due to technical differences between the current approach (i.e., cardiac MRI-based AoPWV) and the approach typically used in prior studies (i.e., applanation tonometry-based carotid-femoral PWV used in prior studies) [25, 27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The null findings in this study may possibly reflect that we studied a relatively healthy sample with overall well-controlled levels of BP and lipids. Our sample was also older (mean age 68 years); risk factor associations are generally attenuated in older compared to younger individuals [32]. Moreover, our results may also differ from prior studies due to technical differences between the current approach (i.e., cardiac MRI-based AoPWV) and the approach typically used in prior studies (i.e., applanation tonometry-based carotid-femoral PWV used in prior studies) [25, 27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observation that risk factors for a disease are weaker for older individuals is not unique for the study of SEP and AF, as the impact of CVD risk factors seems to decrease by age. This is partly explained by the survival effect, which means that those with many risk factors already have experienced an event or died before inclusion 33. Furthermore, low SEP is associated with higher mortality and a selection bias in the oldest age may explain the observed association.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, all procedures conducted in both groups were identical, and they were treated separately only in analysis. The age of 40 was chosen in order to divide the study sample into younger and older ones, as in a number of studies of cardiovascular risk, the participants aged above 40 are treated as a separate group, as they may develop cardiovascular problems even if not diagnosed [ 12 , 13 ]. Similarly, for the Framingham Heart Study cohort, the age group of participants older than 40 was also analyzed [ 14 ] and some authors even recommend to conduct the formal cardiovascular disease risk assessment, in the case of no risk factors, only for patients at the age of 40 or more [ 15 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%