2010
DOI: 10.1177/1538574410370375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Aggressive Endovascular Recanalization Techniques on Success Rate in Chronic Total Arterial Occlusions (CTOs)

Abstract: Aggressive recanalization techniques in CTO following failure of traditional means are safe and can substantially improve procedural success rates.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(68 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22], with a mean overall procedure duration from ENABLER-P catheter anchoring to withdrawal of 14.7 minutes (range 1-44).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22], with a mean overall procedure duration from ENABLER-P catheter anchoring to withdrawal of 14.7 minutes (range 1-44).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main reasons for failure of CTO recanalization are the inability to cross the occlusion with a guidewire or the inability to re-enter the true lumen following subintimal tracking. 9,10 Advancements in imaging technologies have improved CTO crossing techniques, rendering them more effective in some complex lesions. Long or heavily calcified lesions are often treated with subintimal angioplasty, a technique that has revolutionized the treatment of above-the-knee arterial occlusions.…”
Section: ¤ ¤mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our approach is also less risky than a "pure" retrograde approach from the ipsilateral femoral as it is easier to confirm position in the true lumen in the Aorta and can lower the risk of perforation or dissection at the distal Aorta [10] without requiring complicated imaging guided reentry devices [8]. This approach is also less aggressive and worth attempting before trying more radical methods such as stiff end of wires and sharp needles as described in other reports [7]. There are additional factors that may have contributed to the success in the described cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The most common reason for failure of an endovascular approach in CTOs is inability to cross the CTO with a guidewire [7]. In cases with a retrograde femoral approach from the ipsilateral side can be complicated by difficulty in obtaining femoral access and if successful access is obtained, there can be difficulty in crossing the distal cap and use of re-entry devices is fraught with the risk of causing perforation especially with unpredictable level of reentry into the Aorta.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9) CTO lesions can result in a worsening of the initial procedural success rate. 10) Because of difficulty in penetrating CTO lesions with marked calcification, special devices are required in some cases. 11) Even if the initial procedure is successful, CTO is recognized as one of the factors affecting in-stent restenosis (ISR) and the long-term outcome of EVT for CTO lesions in SFA is one of the remaining issues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%