1996
DOI: 10.1097/00001199-199606000-00006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Age on Functional Outcome Following Traumatic Brain Injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
15
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
15
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the decrease of neuroplasticity with age may be an explanation for the better outcome of cognitive functions following nonprogressive brain injury in younger adults. This assumption, however, is not supported by all studies (Reeder, Rosenthal, Lichtenberg, & Wood, 1996 ). An alternative explanation for our fi nding may be the special vulnerability of elderly patients to neurologic disease and injury (Kulchycki & Edlow, 2006 ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…Therefore, the decrease of neuroplasticity with age may be an explanation for the better outcome of cognitive functions following nonprogressive brain injury in younger adults. This assumption, however, is not supported by all studies (Reeder, Rosenthal, Lichtenberg, & Wood, 1996 ). An alternative explanation for our fi nding may be the special vulnerability of elderly patients to neurologic disease and injury (Kulchycki & Edlow, 2006 ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…Although older adults are less likely than the young to survive severe injury, this case study and other supporting research [35,36] suggest that older adults who do survive can potentially follow the same gradient of recovery evident in younger patients and may benefit equally well from rehabilitation. This conclusion contrasts with the conservative approach to treatment of older persons with severe brain injury recommended by some [37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Past studies of the relationship between age and rehabilitation outcomes have been inconsistent, with some finding worse outcomes with higher age, 15,16 while others failed to find age differences. 26,27 Higher age predicted poorer motor outcome at 9-month follow-up in all subgroups, and had a similar effect on cognitive outcome, but only for the lowest 3 levels of admission FIM cognitive score. The negative effect of age on cognitive outcomes appeared to be stronger for persons who started rehabilitation with lower cognitive performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%