2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2009.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of age on FDG uptake in the liver on PET scan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This positive correlation was also observed by Lin et al 16 On the contrary, there was a trend for a decrease in breast tumor SUV with increasing age, which did not reach statistical significance. In a previous study of 132 patients, we reported a significant negative correlation between patient age and breast tumor SUV.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…This positive correlation was also observed by Lin et al 16 On the contrary, there was a trend for a decrease in breast tumor SUV with increasing age, which did not reach statistical significance. In a previous study of 132 patients, we reported a significant negative correlation between patient age and breast tumor SUV.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Numerous authors have used SUV to compare the uptake of 18 F-FDG in lesions with that in normal liver [8][9][10]. However, recent studies have reported that liver 18 F-FDG uptake was vulnerable to variations in age, height, weight, BMI, glucose levels, hepatocellular steatosis, serologic liver enzymes, and serologic lipids [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. However, recent studies have reported that liver 18 F-FDG uptake was vulnerable to variations in age, height, weight, BMI, glucose levels, hepatocellular steatosis, serologic liver enzymes, and serologic lipids [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study demonstrated that a shorter delay results in higher background activity, which has been proven to reduce overall PET sensitivity and accuracy (17). Any loss of patient throughput by adopting a 90-min delay could be mitigated by appropriately staggering injection times.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%