2015
DOI: 10.1111/jgh.13002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of acute kidney injury on prognosis of patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites: A retrospective cohort study

Abstract: AKIN criteria-considering small increases in serum creatinine rather than absolute thresholds-seem to be more accurate for estimating prognosis of AKI after paracentesis than C-AKI criteria. Even patients developing AKI-1 with "normal" serum creatinine are at increased risk for mortality.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
34
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(95 reference statements)
3
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…18 Despite previous SCr thresholds being considered for clinical relevance in cirrhotic patients, 24 lesser degrees of baseline renal dysfunction can be associated with reduced survival. 18,23,25 In fact, in our cohort, the baseline SCr threshold with highest validity for predicting AKI was 0.9 mg/dL. The MELD score is a validated prognostic marker in a wide range of severity and causes of cirrhosis, which incorporates an assessment of renal function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…18 Despite previous SCr thresholds being considered for clinical relevance in cirrhotic patients, 24 lesser degrees of baseline renal dysfunction can be associated with reduced survival. 18,23,25 In fact, in our cohort, the baseline SCr threshold with highest validity for predicting AKI was 0.9 mg/dL. The MELD score is a validated prognostic marker in a wide range of severity and causes of cirrhosis, which incorporates an assessment of renal function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…[19][20][21] The KDIGO classification accurately detects minor variations in SCr values which have been associated with poor prognosis in cirrhotic patients. 18,22,23 In addition, AKI superimposed on previous renal dysfunction confers a higher risk for mortality. 18 Despite previous SCr thresholds being considered for clinical relevance in cirrhotic patients, 24 lesser degrees of baseline renal dysfunction can be associated with reduced survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acute kidney injury is an important risk factor associated with the prognosis of cirrhotic patients. Especially, AKI is a significant predictor for mortality in cirrhotic patients with ascites . Therefore, early detection and adequate management of AKI can lead to improved prognosis of cirrhotic patients with ascites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Fagundes et al developed a ‘new classification’ that combined the AKIN criteria and traditional criterion in cirrhosis [9] (i) stage 1 with a final sCr of ≤1.5 mg/dl; (ii) stage 1 with a final sCr of >1.5 mg/dl, and (iii) combined stages 2 and 3, providing a better prognostic stratification than AKIN criteria alone. Whereas, it has recently been challenged that even “mild” AKI in cirrhotic patients whose peak sCr remained below 1.5mg/dl had a surprisingly higher mortality rate compared to those without AKI, indicating that the ‘new classification’ proposed by Fagundes et al did not improve the prognostic assessment of patients with cirrhosis [18, 19]. Therefore, it seems all of these various criteria are not that perfect, still requiring further refinement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%