2021
DOI: 10.19102/icrm.2021.121101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Active Esophageal Cooling on Fluoroscopy Usage During Left Atrial Ablation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different methods have been proposed for this purpose which broadly may be considered ‘reactive’ (apply in response to an elevated oesophageal temperature) or ‘proactive’ cooling (pre-emptively cool prior to any risk of thermal injury). 35 Reduced procedure time, 36 fluoroscopy, 37 and overall cost 38 and no reduction in ablation efficacy, efficiency, and safety 39 were some of the benefits highlighted for dedicated active cooling devices. In turn, a recent systematic review and meta-analysis found that oesophageal cooling did not reduce the overall risk of any oesophageal injury compared to control.…”
Section: Strategies To Target the Spb By Percutaneous Radiofrequency ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different methods have been proposed for this purpose which broadly may be considered ‘reactive’ (apply in response to an elevated oesophageal temperature) or ‘proactive’ cooling (pre-emptively cool prior to any risk of thermal injury). 35 Reduced procedure time, 36 fluoroscopy, 37 and overall cost 38 and no reduction in ablation efficacy, efficiency, and safety 39 were some of the benefits highlighted for dedicated active cooling devices. In turn, a recent systematic review and meta-analysis found that oesophageal cooling did not reduce the overall risk of any oesophageal injury compared to control.…”
Section: Strategies To Target the Spb By Percutaneous Radiofrequency ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general procedures utilized by operators at the study sites have been previously described. [10,11] All patients were treated under general anesthesia for their ablation procedure. Electrophysiologist physicians at all sites performed primarily wide area circumferential pulmonary vein isolation with additional posterior wall isolation dependent on physician practice.…”
Section: Ablation Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7] A commercially available esophageal cooling device has demonstrated even greater e cacy at reducing severe esophageal lesions during RF ablation, [8,9] resulting in increased adoption of this approach and a growing number of investigations into its effects on procedural factors. [10,11] One outcome that has not been evaluated is the effect of active esophageal cooling on long-term procedural outcomes. The earliest mathematical model of esophageal cooling raised the question of whether the use of an expandable cooled balloon in the esophagus could reduce the ability to achieve transmural lesions in the atrium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rapid adoption of this practice has resulted in the accumulation of data showing a range of ancillary benefits as well. For example, use of active esophageal cooling has been shown to have a significant reduction in fluoroscopy requirements 3. In addition, our group and others recently presented data showing reduced procedure times as well as improvement in long-term freedom from dysrhythmia with cooling, presumably due to the improved ability to perform point-to-point ablation without interruption from local overheating 4…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%