Impact of abortion law reforms on women’s health services and outcomes: a systematic review protocol

Abstract

Background A country’s abortion law is a key component in determining the enabling environment for safe abortion. While restrictive abortion laws still prevail in most low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), many countries have reformed their abortion laws, with the majority of them moving away from an absolute ban. However, the implications of these reforms on women’s access to and use of health services, as well as their health outcomes, is uncertain. First, there are methodological challenges to the evaluation of abortion laws, since these changes are not exogenous. Second, extant evaluations may be limited in terms of their generalizability, given variation in reforms across the abortion legality spectrum and differences in levels of implementation and enforcement cross-nationally. This systematic review aims to address this gap. Our aim is to systematically collect, evaluate, and synthesize empirical research evidence concerning the impact of abortion law reforms on women’s health services and outcomes in LMICs. Methods We will conduct a systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature on changes in abortion laws and women’s health services and outcomes in LMICs. We will search Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases, as well as grey literature and reference lists of included studies for further relevant literature. As our goal is to draw inference on the impact of abortion law reforms, we will include quasi-experimental studies examining the impact of change in abortion laws on at least one of our outcomes of interest. We will assess the methodological quality of studies using the quasi-experimental study designs series checklist. Due to anticipated heterogeneity in policy changes, outcomes, and study designs, we will synthesize results through a narrative description. Discussion This review will systematically appraise and synthesize the research evidence on the impact of abortion law reforms on women’s health services and outcomes in LMICs. We will examine the effect of legislative reforms and investigate the conditions that might contribute to heterogeneous effects, including whether specific groups of women are differentially affected by abortion law reforms. We will discuss gaps and future directions for research. Findings from this review could provide evidence on emerging strategies to influence policy reforms, implement abortion services and scale up accessibility. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42019126927

Telemedicine Abortion During Covid – 19 and the Challenges in Its Applicability in Malaysia

“…13 In the event of an emergency in a remote location, such as on a ship, in an airplane, or potentially on the battlefield, telemedicine is vital. 14 Research has found that the success rate and safety outcomes of medical abortion through telemedicine appear to be very similar to those reported in the literature for in-person abortion services. 15 In a study of 1000 women who underwent self-sourced medical abortion through an online telemedicine service (Women on Web), its reach to result that self-sourcing medical abortion through online telemedicine can be very successful, and the results are comparable to those of in-clinic methods.…”

Immediate and delayed placement of the intrauterine device after abortion: a systematic review and meta-analysis

“…Abortion emerges as a prominent concern in the realm of global health, with varying incidence rates and backgrounds worldwide 1 . It is of utmost importance to address the consequences of abortion, as it significantly increases morbidity and mortality in pregnant and postpartum women 2 .…”

Examining ethno-racial attitudes of the public in Twitter discourses related to the United States Supreme Court Dobbs vs. Jackson Women's Health Organization ruling: A machine learning approach

“…Since Dobbs, there have been varying nationwide implementation of bans or protection of abortion access (11) with several states imposing partial or complete abortion restrictions. In conjunction with a woman's location of residency, restrictive abortion laws serve as socio-ecological determinants of abortion care access which can potentially impact her sexual and reproductive health and wellbeing (12)(13)(14). The reversal of Roe vs. Wade has generated substantial concerns among the public.…”