2013
DOI: 10.1002/tea.21126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of a student-teacher-scientist partnership on students' and teachers' content knowledge, attitudes toward science, and pedagogical practices

Abstract: Engaging K‐12 students in science‐based inquiry is at the center of current science education reform efforts. Inquiry can best be taught through experiential, authentic science experiences, such as those provided by Student–Teacher–Scientist Partnerships (STSPs). However, very little is known about the impact of STSPs on teachers' and students' content knowledge growth or changes in their attitudes about science and scientists. This study addressed these two areas by examining an STSP called “Students, Teacher… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
106
1
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
6
106
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“… Science teachers need to know that change in their teaching practices requires them to experience a conceptual change in their beliefs about student learning, this is a worldwide concerns, stated in several studies like: Metz (2009), Beyer andDavis (2008).  And finally, the researcher agree with (Houseal, Abd-El-Khalick, & Destefano, 2014) that science teachers' preparation programs and training sessions should enable them to "(a) generate answerable questions, (b) think scientifically, (c) analyze phenomena, (d) interpret evidence, and (e) engage in meaningful discourse about the validity of the generated claims" ( p. 85).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“… Science teachers need to know that change in their teaching practices requires them to experience a conceptual change in their beliefs about student learning, this is a worldwide concerns, stated in several studies like: Metz (2009), Beyer andDavis (2008).  And finally, the researcher agree with (Houseal, Abd-El-Khalick, & Destefano, 2014) that science teachers' preparation programs and training sessions should enable them to "(a) generate answerable questions, (b) think scientifically, (c) analyze phenomena, (d) interpret evidence, and (e) engage in meaningful discourse about the validity of the generated claims" ( p. 85).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Also, nature of science and scientific literacy are key aspects of how science education can enable relevant learning conditions. Educational activities should be designed to help students engage in more authentic science experiences grounded in the scientific reasoning (Chinn and Malhotra 2002) or tools, techniques, attitudes and processes of scientific inquiry (Houseal et al 2014. If that educational situation is the case, what follows is a more contextual use of scientific concepts, but not necessarily an understanding of the different epistemic functions that concepts have across disciplinary boundaries.…”
Section: Teaching Scientific Concepts As Contextually Understoodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like Houseal et al [25] , communication was a challenge between the pre-service elementary teachers and engineering students. Using jargon that was unique to the individual group -education or engineering -hindered communication as a collaborative group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Houseal, Abd-El-Khalick and Destefano [25] recognized that the teachers actually play two roles in the collaborations. The teachers take on the role of a student to learn about science practices and the role of a teacher to transform the knowledge to pedagogical strategies.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation