2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of a program to prevent central line-associated bloodstream infection in the zero tolerance era

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
11

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
36
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Eight of them (53,3%) were developed in the USA (6,9,(15)(16)18,(22)(23)25) and only three (20%) were developed in Latin America, two of them in Brazil (20)(21) and one in Colombia (14) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Eight of them (53,3%) were developed in the USA (6,9,(15)(16)18,(22)(23)25) and only three (20%) were developed in Latin America, two of them in Brazil (20)(21) and one in Colombia (14) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) was mentioned in four studies (14)(15)(21)(22) and only one of them describes infection rates per catheter type (14) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations