Impact of a multiyear professional development intervention on science achievement of culturally and linguistically diverse elementary students

Abstract

This study examined the impact of the 3‐year implementation of a professional development intervention on science achievement of culturally and linguistically diverse elementary students. Teachers were provided with instructional units and workshops that were designed to improve teaching practices and foster positive beliefs about science and literacy with diverse student groups. The study involved third, fourth, and fifth grade students at six elementary schools in a large urban school district during the 2001 through 2004 school years. Significance tests of mean scores between pre‐ and posttests indicated statistically significant increases each year on all measures of science at all three grade levels. Achievement gaps among demographic subgroups sometimes narrowed among fourth grade students and remained consistent among third and fifth grade students. Item‐by‐item comparisons with NAEP and TIMSS samples indicated overall positive performance by students at the end of each school year. The consistent patterns of positive outcomes indicate the effectiveness of our intervention in producing achievement gains at all three grade levels while also reducing achievement gaps among demographic subgroups at the fourth grade. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 45: 726–747, 2008

Helping ELLs Meet the Common Core State Standards for Literacy in Science: The Impact of an Instructional Intervention Focused on Academic Language

“…These findings corroborate numerous descriptive studies (Curtis & Millar, 1988;Gibbons, 2003;Miller, 2009;Parkinson, Jackson, Kirkwood, & Padayachee, 2007;Tobin & McRobbie, 1996;Torres & Zeidler, 2002;Young & Nguyen, 2002) and preexperimental studies (Amaral, Garrison, & Klentschy, 2002;Fradd, Lee, Sutman, & Saxton, 2002;O. Lee, Deaktor, et al, 2008;O.…”

“…Lee, Maerten-Rivera et al (2008; see also O. Lee, Deaktor, Enders, & Lambert, 2008;O. Lee, Mahotiere, Salinas, Penfield, & Maerten-Rivera, 2009) fully considered students' language and cultural backgrounds as well as best practices in science teaching and professional development.…”

Professional Development for Science Teachers

“…We also need better measures and interventions that are more highly specified. Though some might hope for a silver bullet, education reform that leads to fundamental change, such as that envisioned in the NGSS, requires time [it takes several years for teachers to change their practice (6,27,28)]. Reform efforts also require investments in infrastructure (leadership, teacher networks, planning time), the organizational coherence that encourages teachers to take risks and learn new content, parents to support the new standards, and students to demonstrate the perseverance and curiosity needed to achieve scientific literacy.…”

Social Problem Solving Through Science: An Approach to Critical, Place-Based, Science Teaching and Learning

“…These lists of benchmarks are rarely connected and almost never prioritized by importance to their discipline, conceptual difficulty of understanding, or relevance to students' lives. This standards-based approach to teaching has done little to reduce achievement gaps on test results across demographic subgroups (Lee, Deaktor, Enders, & Lambert, 2008), one of the stated goals of the No Child Left Behind (2002) legislation that has largely been responsible for driving this instruction-assessment paradigm. Assessment has now become a driving force behind classroom instruction.…”