2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.08.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of a higher fecal immunochemistry test cut-off on pathology detected in subsequent rounds of a colorectal screening program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results agree with previous data already described in the literature. Furthermore, the increased risk of detecting a neoplasia during a new screening 2 years after a negative screening test result has already been reported in Ireland[ 14 ] and recently in the Ile-de-France region[ 27 ]. These authors observed variable proportions of pathologies (advanced adenomas or CRC) during a subsequent campaign and hypothesized that these lesions could have been diagnosed during the previous campaign if the FIT positivity threshold was not relatively high.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These results agree with previous data already described in the literature. Furthermore, the increased risk of detecting a neoplasia during a new screening 2 years after a negative screening test result has already been reported in Ireland[ 14 ] and recently in the Ile-de-France region[ 27 ]. These authors observed variable proportions of pathologies (advanced adenomas or CRC) during a subsequent campaign and hypothesized that these lesions could have been diagnosed during the previous campaign if the FIT positivity threshold was not relatively high.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These authors observed variable proportions of pathologies (advanced adenomas or CRC) during a subsequent campaign and hypothesized that these lesions could have been diagnosed during the previous campaign if the FIT positivity threshold was not relatively high. However, they admitted that lowering the positivity threshold would both allow the diagnosis of lesions that could be serious only 2 years later and create an unsustainable endoscopy referral burden[ 14 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several approaches to optimisation have been taken, most importantly the use of faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) versus the traditional guaiac-based faecal occult blood tests, [14][15][16] but also a two-tier reflex approach, 17 varying screening frequency 18 or the threshold used with FIT, 19,20 personalising the threshold by including factors such as sex and age in a risk-score, [21][22][23][24] or going further, for example through neural network risk modelling. 25 The European Commission's scientific advisors advocate the approach of threshold individualisation as a way to improve CRC screening programmes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, in a survey report of China in 2015, the number of CRC patients and deaths were 376,300 and 191,000 respectively, followed by gastric cancer, liver cancer, and esophageal cancer ( 5 ). CRC patients can have a higher survival rates if having an early diagnosis and fit treatment ( 6 , 7 ). About 8 to 29% of CRC patients were obstructive colorectal cancer (OCRC) when diagnosed at the first time ( 8 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%