Abstract:4 + 1 schedule improves visit continuity from a resident perspective, and may compromise visit continuity from the patient perspective, but allows for improved laboratory follow-up, which we pose should be part of an emerging modern definition of continuity.
“…22,23 Given the noted strain between competing inpatient and outpatient responsibilities, 24 the continuity clinic experience for IM residents can become stressful and there is variable program compliance with ACGME ambulatory training requirements. 25 In an attempt to uncouple inpatient and outpatient training, a few new program models have developed, which include a year long ambulatory block 26 and an alternating 4:1 week inpatient to ambulatory schedule [27][28][29] that might help to support ambulatory education. Emphasizing outpatient training and education during residency while simultaneously providing protected time to practice ambulatory medicine may help retain resident interest in primary care.…”
PURPOSE: Professional and governmental organizations recommend an ideal US physician workforce composed of at least 40 % primary care physicians. They also support primary care residencies to promote careers in primary care. Our study examines the relationship between graduation from a primary care or categorical internal medicine residency program and subsequent career choice. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional electronic survey of a cohort of internal medicine residency alumni who graduated between 2001 and 2010 from a large academic center. Our primary predictor was graduation from a primary care versus a categorical internal medicine program and our primary outcome is current career role. We performed chi-square analysis comparing responses of primary care and categorical residents. RESULTS: We contacted 481 out of 513 alumni, of whom 322 responded (67 %). We compared 106 responses from primary care alumni to 169 responses from categorical alumni. Fifty-four percent of primary care alumni agreed that the majority of their current clinical work is in outpatient primary care vs. 20 % of categorical alumni (p<0.001). While 92.5 % of primary-care alumni were interested in a primary care career prior to residency, only 63 % remained interested after residency. Thirty of the 34 primary care alumni (88 %) who lost interest in a primary care career during residency agreed that their ambulatory experience during residency influenced their subsequent career choice. CONCLUSIONS: A higher percentage of primary care alumni practice outpatient primary care as compared to categorical alumni. Some alumni lost interest in primary care during residency. The outpatient clinic experience may impact interest in primary care.
“…22,23 Given the noted strain between competing inpatient and outpatient responsibilities, 24 the continuity clinic experience for IM residents can become stressful and there is variable program compliance with ACGME ambulatory training requirements. 25 In an attempt to uncouple inpatient and outpatient training, a few new program models have developed, which include a year long ambulatory block 26 and an alternating 4:1 week inpatient to ambulatory schedule [27][28][29] that might help to support ambulatory education. Emphasizing outpatient training and education during residency while simultaneously providing protected time to practice ambulatory medicine may help retain resident interest in primary care.…”
PURPOSE: Professional and governmental organizations recommend an ideal US physician workforce composed of at least 40 % primary care physicians. They also support primary care residencies to promote careers in primary care. Our study examines the relationship between graduation from a primary care or categorical internal medicine residency program and subsequent career choice. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional electronic survey of a cohort of internal medicine residency alumni who graduated between 2001 and 2010 from a large academic center. Our primary predictor was graduation from a primary care versus a categorical internal medicine program and our primary outcome is current career role. We performed chi-square analysis comparing responses of primary care and categorical residents. RESULTS: We contacted 481 out of 513 alumni, of whom 322 responded (67 %). We compared 106 responses from primary care alumni to 169 responses from categorical alumni. Fifty-four percent of primary care alumni agreed that the majority of their current clinical work is in outpatient primary care vs. 20 % of categorical alumni (p<0.001). While 92.5 % of primary-care alumni were interested in a primary care career prior to residency, only 63 % remained interested after residency. Thirty of the 34 primary care alumni (88 %) who lost interest in a primary care career during residency agreed that their ambulatory experience during residency influenced their subsequent career choice. CONCLUSIONS: A higher percentage of primary care alumni practice outpatient primary care as compared to categorical alumni. Some alumni lost interest in primary care during residency. The outpatient clinic experience may impact interest in primary care.
“…Such models have been shown to improve continuity for the resident, but patient access and patient perception of continuity may not improve. Ambulatory blocks improve laboratory follow-up among residents (22), but other data for residents is lacking.…”
Section: Challenges and Solutions To Resident Ambulatory Gim Trainingmentioning
“…15 Although this approach has advantages, such as enabling engagement in quality improvement efforts, residents often spend significant time in other ''immersion'' activities, and are less available for their patients' longitudinal care. 16 In primary care specialties, academic practices are increasingly adopting training models consistent with the patient-centered medical home concept. 17 By leveraging interprofessional teammates to provide timely care, physician-patient continuity may be sacrificed.…”
Section: The Current Reality: Discontinuities Of Carementioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.