PsycEXTRA Dataset 1977
DOI: 10.1037/e516142009-001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact model of managers' interpersonal communication styles in an industrial and a navy civilian organization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, Downs and Adrian (2004) argued that the supervisor-subordinate relationship can be the most important in any organization because of the potential organizational consequence. In line with this study's findings, extant research has demonstrated that trust in the supervisor-subordinate relationship can influence the quality of communication exchanged between supervisor and subordinate (Klauss & Bass, 1982;Kramer, 2017).…”
Section: Discussion Limitations and Future Researchsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, Downs and Adrian (2004) argued that the supervisor-subordinate relationship can be the most important in any organization because of the potential organizational consequence. In line with this study's findings, extant research has demonstrated that trust in the supervisor-subordinate relationship can influence the quality of communication exchanged between supervisor and subordinate (Klauss & Bass, 1982;Kramer, 2017).…”
Section: Discussion Limitations and Future Researchsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Downs and Adrian (2004) showed that trust is essential to the superior-subordinate relationship. Trust is an important influence on the quality of communication between a subordinate and superior (Klauss & Bass, 1982;Kramer, 2017). Management can be perceived as an agent of trust by an employee, so any breach in trust by a supervisor could be viewed as failure of the company to keep its commitment to employees (Lester, Turnley, Bloodgood, & Bolino, 2002).…”
Section: Supervisor Trustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A transformational leader will foster closer relationships with subordinates, characterized by small power distance and by individualized consideration of members' needs and capabilities (Bass, 1990;Yukl, 2006). This relationship is sustained by mutual trust and openness , and by the richness of verbal communication between leaders and members (Klauss & Bass, 1982). Such leaders create more opportunities for sharing and clarifying perceptions (Kozlowski & Doherty, 1989) and offer better articulation of task cues (Kirkpatrick & Locke, 1996), all of which should provide group members with better information for assessing what is prioritized, valued, and supported, promoting the development of shared cognitions, hence a stronger climate.…”
Section: Leadership As a Climate Antecedentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Open communication creates opportunities for the subordinates to express their emotions to their supervisors, eliminating misunderstandings and decreasing the negative relationships between them. It indirectly leads to positive job satisfaction (e.g., Burke & Wilcox, 1969;Rings, 1976), better job performance (e.g., Indik et al, 1961;Willits, 1967), and role clarity (e.g., Klauss & Bass, 1982).…”
Section: Communication Openness As a Moderatormentioning
confidence: 99%