2011
DOI: 10.1162/inov_a_00077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact Investing: Transforming How We Make Money while Making a Difference

Abstract: An investor in Hong Kong wants to secure her children's economic future. But, she also wants to use her wealth to address the social and environmental challenges she cares about and thereby leave a broader legacy. She becomes convinced that simply giving her money away cannot be the only way she can make a difference. So, she redirects her assets into investments that preserve her wealth and also directly tackle problems of poverty and environmental degradation.A group of friends volunteering for a nonprofit o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
125
0
8

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
125
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…They constitute a specific category of non-for-profit organizations, developing innovative ways to tackle complex social problems and fill in the insufficiencies of other non-for-profit organizations. To do so, they take advantage of the combination of social and business logics (Bugg-Levine and Emerson, 2011;Kroeger and Weber, 2014), searching for a blended value (Emerson, 2003 and the "Blended value proposition"). Already in 2002, Lynn Sharpe Pain supported the idea that to be considered as superior performing firms, they had to turn to a shift in value, and consider, besides the financial performance, non-financial one (Sánchez, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They constitute a specific category of non-for-profit organizations, developing innovative ways to tackle complex social problems and fill in the insufficiencies of other non-for-profit organizations. To do so, they take advantage of the combination of social and business logics (Bugg-Levine and Emerson, 2011;Kroeger and Weber, 2014), searching for a blended value (Emerson, 2003 and the "Blended value proposition"). Already in 2002, Lynn Sharpe Pain supported the idea that to be considered as superior performing firms, they had to turn to a shift in value, and consider, besides the financial performance, non-financial one (Sánchez, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How much of a foundation's assets should go into "impact investments"? And there is also the issue of how to calculate the impact of an investment -especially before you make it, which is when that information is really useful (Brest & Born, 2013;Bugg-Levine & Emerson 2011).…”
Section: The Trouble With Impact Investingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For philanthropy to embrace impact investing fully, it must find a way to understand these opportunities in terms of their blended value of both impact and financial return. Several efforts are underway to standardize and make transparent the impacts of for-profit entities, which will help evaluate individual impact investments in a systematic way (Godeke & Burckart, 2015;Miller & Johnson, 2015;Miller & Rogers, 2014;Bugg-Levine & Emerson, 2011).…”
Section: Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a scarcity of high quality investment opportunities into which larger amounts of capital can be deployed. As in the mainstream financial markets, investment evolution is not necessarily linear although it is often assumed to follow a path from individual transactions, to boutique offerings to funds, funds of funds and ultimately fully "liquid", or tradable, capital markets where investors have a range of choices to buy and sell investments (Bugg-Levine and Emerson, 2011). More products could be developed, across the risk return spectrum, into which institutional investors can deploy social impact investment funds.…”
Section: Further Engagement Of Mainstream Investorsmentioning
confidence: 99%