IMPACT - Integrative Medicine PrimAry Care Trial: protocol for a comparative effectiveness study of the clinical and cost outcomes of an integrative primary care clinic model

Abstract

BackgroundIntegrative medicine (IM) is a patient-centered, healing-oriented clinical paradigm that explicitly includes all appropriate therapeutic approaches whether they originate in conventional or complementary medicine (CM). While there is some evidence for the clinical and cost-effectiveness of IM practice models, the existing evidence base for IM depends largely on studies of individual CM therapies. This may in part be due to the methodological challenges inherent in evaluating a complex intervention (i.e., many interacting components applied flexibly and with tailoring) such as IM.Methods/DesignThis study will use a combination of observational quantitative and qualitative methods to rigorously measure the health and healthcare utilization outcomes of the University of Arizona Integrative Health Center (UAIHC), an IM adult primary care clinic in Phoenix, Arizona. There are four groups of study participants. The primary group consists of clinic patients for whom clinical and cost outcomes will be tracked indicating the impact of the UAIHC clinic (n = 500). In addition to comparing outcomes pre/post clinic enrollment, where possible, these outcomes will be compared to those of two matched control groups, and for some self-report measures, to regional and national data. The second and third study groups consist of clinic patients (n = 180) and clinic personnel (n = 15-20) from whom fidelity data (i.e., data indicating the extent to which the IM practice model was implemented as planned) will be collected. These data will be analyzed to determine the exact nature of the intervention as implemented and to provide covariates to the outcomes analyses as the clinic evolves. The fourth group is made up of patients (n = 8) whose path through the clinic will be studied in detail using qualitative (periodic semi-structured interviews) methods. These data will be used to develop hypotheses regarding how the clinic works.DiscussionThe US health care system needs new models of care that are more patient-centered and empower patients to make positive lifestyle changes. These models have the potential to reduce the burden of chronic disease, lower the cost of healthcare, and offer a sustainable financial paradigm for our nation. This protocol has been designed to test whether the UAIHC can achieve this potential.Trial registrationClinical Trials.gov NCT01785485.

Process of care in outpatient Integrative healthcare facilities: a systematic review of clinical trials

“…Process evaluations within trials explore the implementation, receipt, and setting of an intervention and help in the interpretation of the outcome [ 58 ]. A process evaluation embedded within future trials may assist in documenting the time taken to construct a patient profile; the skills needed to collect the information for the patient profile; the time needed to devise a treatment plan, present the plan and reach consensus; help to distinguish between essential and non-essential components of the intervention; investigate contextual factors that affect an intervention; patient responsiveness; practitioner delivery; and monitor dose [ 23 , 59 , 60 ].…”

“…This supports other studies that indicate that IHC is associated with improved health related quality of life in diverse populations with substantial co-morbidity [ 70 ]. Including measures that capture these outcomes is particularly relevant if the cost effectiveness of IHC through its capacity to reduce co-morbidities alongside disease specific symptoms and improve total well-being is to be captured [ 56 , 60 , 69 , 71 ].…”

Current Research Trends in Randomized Controlled Trials Investigating the Combined Effect of Korean Medicine and Western Medicine Treatment

“…The Korean healthcare system has used Korean medicine and Western medicine treatment for a long time. Recently, not only has there been an increasing interest in integrative medicine from patients and the medical community in Korea, but also from around the globe [10][11][12][13][14][15], and these preferences may reduce the social costs, and complement limitations in both approaches to medicine [2]. An integrative healthcare system can also promote patients' autonomy in medical decision-making, and improve the quality and convenience of medical services [1,16].…”

Integrative Oncology: International Perspectives

“…TCIM literacy in oncology for physicians is being facilitated by the development of specific training courses. Both the University of Michigan 11 and Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) 12 offer an IO fellowship for junior physicians. MD Anderson Cancer Center 13 offers integrative medicine program workshops to health care professionals interested in learning about IO care.…”