2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2013.02.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact experiments of exotic dust grain capture by highly porous primitive bodies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were found for the impact penetration of projectiles into highly porous sintered glass beads targets (Okamoto et al. ). The empirical relationship between the largest fragment mass fraction and the peak pressure P i normalized by the tensile strength of the target Y t is given as follows:mL,pMp=10a(PiYt)b, where a = 2.16 ± 0.93 and 2.26 ± 0.53, b = −1.81 ± 0.65 and −2.37 ± 0.38, for WP and basalt projectiles versus sand, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar results were found for the impact penetration of projectiles into highly porous sintered glass beads targets (Okamoto et al. ). The empirical relationship between the largest fragment mass fraction and the peak pressure P i normalized by the tensile strength of the target Y t is given as follows:mL,pMp=10a(PiYt)b, where a = 2.16 ± 0.93 and 2.26 ± 0.53, b = −1.81 ± 0.65 and −2.37 ± 0.38, for WP and basalt projectiles versus sand, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…It is notable that destruction started to occur when the ratio of the peak pressure was about ten times the tensile strength. Similar results were found for the impact penetration of projectiles into highly porous sintered glass beads targets (Okamoto et al 2013). The empirical relationship between the largest fragment mass fraction and the peak pressure P i normalized by the tensile strength of the target Y t is given as follows:…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The compressive strength of HGB87 (1.7 ± 0.4 MPa) agreed to within 1  with a target prepared using the same peak temperature and duration in a previous study, which had a compressive strength of 1.4 ± 0.4 MPa (fluffy87 in Okamoto et al, 2013). The compressive strength of HGB94 (0.09 ± 0.03 MPa) was lower than one with the same porosity, which had a compressive strength of 0.47 ± 0.13 MPa (fluffy94 in Okamoto et al, 2013), because of the lower peak temperature used during the heating process in this study. The compressive strength decreased with the increase of mixing fraction of perlite grains, i.e., HGB87 > mix2:1 > mix1:1.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The results revealed that the cavity below the impact point in a highly porous target becomes bulb-shaped when the projectile is broken (Okamoto et al, 2013;. Figure 5 presents an example of a cavity.…”
Section: Cavitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the cavity depth of porous targets including highly porous aerogels increases more rapidly with the density ratio (Love et al, 1993;Michikami et al, 2007). A semi-empirical expression for the penetration depth of an impactor for highly porous targets with a linear dependence on the density ratio has been proposed as follows (Okamoto et al, 2013):…”
Section: Depth Of Cratermentioning
confidence: 99%