Proceedings Sixth International Workshop on Groupware. CRIWG 2000
DOI: 10.1109/criwg.2000.885165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact evaluation of organisational changes enabled by workflow systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that there are various studies that investigate the impact of WfMSs in a broader context: the impact on the employees and culture in the organization (Atkinson & Lam, 1999;Doherty & Perry, 2001;Kueng, 2000;Mutschler, Rijpkema, & Reichert, 2007;Poelmans, Reijers, & Recker, 2013;Poelmans & Reijers, 2009;Reijers & Poelmans, 2007;Sarmento & Machado, 2000;Vanderfeesten & Reijers, 2005), studies that propose a method or model to describe the economic impact (Gruber & Huemer, 2009;Mutschler, 2006;Pantazi & Georgopoulos, 2006), and studies into tool selection (Berger, Ellmer, Quirchmayr, & Zeitlinger, 1997;Gruber, 2009;Zur Muehlen, 1999) and critical success factors for implementing WfMSs (Mutschler, Reichert, & Bumiller, 2008;Parkes, 2002;Ravesteyn & Batenburg, 2010;Ravesteyn, 2007;Trkman, 2010).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that there are various studies that investigate the impact of WfMSs in a broader context: the impact on the employees and culture in the organization (Atkinson & Lam, 1999;Doherty & Perry, 2001;Kueng, 2000;Mutschler, Rijpkema, & Reichert, 2007;Poelmans, Reijers, & Recker, 2013;Poelmans & Reijers, 2009;Reijers & Poelmans, 2007;Sarmento & Machado, 2000;Vanderfeesten & Reijers, 2005), studies that propose a method or model to describe the economic impact (Gruber & Huemer, 2009;Mutschler, 2006;Pantazi & Georgopoulos, 2006), and studies into tool selection (Berger, Ellmer, Quirchmayr, & Zeitlinger, 1997;Gruber, 2009;Zur Muehlen, 1999) and critical success factors for implementing WfMSs (Mutschler, Reichert, & Bumiller, 2008;Parkes, 2002;Ravesteyn & Batenburg, 2010;Ravesteyn, 2007;Trkman, 2010).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same rate is also influenced by the state variable "Emotional Resistance of End Users". The latter is reasonable as the costs for introducing a WfMS are significantly influenced by user resistance [12,20]. Emotional resistance, in turn, can be decreased by an early and effective communication of background information regarding the introduction of a WfMS.…”
Section: Model Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of such a system can be observed in several domains of the organization (i.e. productivity, knowledge, collaboration, coordination, and communication), and at different levels of abstraction (the organizational level and the task level) (Sarmento, 2000a; Sarmento, 2000b). For example, Reijers and van der Aalst (2005) have investigated the impact of WfMS's on organizations in terms of productivity (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%