2009
DOI: 10.1596/1813-9450-4963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact Estimation Of Disasters: A Global Aggregate For 1960 To 2007

Abstract: The Policy Research Working Paper Series disseminates the findings of work in progress to encourage the exchange of ideas about development issues. An objective of the series is to get the findings out quickly, even if the presentations are less than fully polished. The papers carry the names of the authors and should be cited accordingly. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper are entirely those of the authors. They do not necessarily represent the views of the International Ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some argue this may be especially true for rising urban centers with their increasing populations and the infrastructure buildup (The Economist 2012). Others suggest there are no significant trends in disaster loss and damage (Okuyama andSahin 2009, Neumayer andBarthel 2010), as shown in hurricane losses and damages in the US from 1900 to 2005 (Pielke et al 2008). …”
Section: B Population Exposure and Vulnerabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some argue this may be especially true for rising urban centers with their increasing populations and the infrastructure buildup (The Economist 2012). Others suggest there are no significant trends in disaster loss and damage (Okuyama andSahin 2009, Neumayer andBarthel 2010), as shown in hurricane losses and damages in the US from 1900 to 2005 (Pielke et al 2008). …”
Section: B Population Exposure and Vulnerabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, risk assessment is usuall y focused on the valuation of the potential consequences , but very often these are limited to the expected damages in terms of direct and tangible expected costs. Yet very little attention is given to indirect and intangible costs, which are proven to be a quite relevant component of the potential consequences of a n atural disaster (Cochrane 2004, Okuyama andSahin 2009 ). Given the interconnectivit y of the econom y at multiple scales, it is very important to evaluate the indirect risks of flood damages outside of the disaster area to achieve a comprehensive risk assessment.…”
Section: R = F (H V E) [1]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study is performed for several reasons. Amongst the various types of natural disasters that can lead to bridge closures and failures, floods are a leading cause of bridge closures and failures [7,8]. More intense flooding is expected to occur in flood-prone areas in the future as more frequent and heavier periods of precipitation occur as a result of climate change [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%