2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact Earth: A review of the terrestrial impact record

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 351 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…arrangement indicates a deep LRM layer, succeeded by a layer of LBP and finally HRP, the deepest layer always being located at the center of the crater (Osinski et al, 2022;Stöffler et al, 1975). These observations provide information on the relative timing of the setting of the exterior and interior plains.…”
Section: Relative Timing For Interior and Exterior Plains From Morpho...mentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…arrangement indicates a deep LRM layer, succeeded by a layer of LBP and finally HRP, the deepest layer always being located at the center of the crater (Osinski et al, 2022;Stöffler et al, 1975). These observations provide information on the relative timing of the setting of the exterior and interior plains.…”
Section: Relative Timing For Interior and Exterior Plains From Morpho...mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Indeed, the area is not disturbed by any tectonic event and it is therefore possible to apply the geological principles of superposition. According to crater ejecta deposition, this arrangement indicates a deep LRM layer, succeeded by a layer of LBP and finally HRP, the deepest layer always being located at the center of the crater (Osinski et al., 2022; Stöffler et al., 1975). These observations provide information on the relative timing of the setting of the exterior and interior plains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, of course, it is possible that some of the impact-related material derives from an unknown impact structure hidden under the ice, the only likely scenario is that it originates from the nearby Hiawatha structure. We follow the recommendation of Osinski et al (2022): "samples in which shock metamorphic criteria are determined need not be in situ, as long as there is a clear topographic crater form and evidence (e.g., glacial flow directions) to connect the two". Clear evidence connecting sampled material to the Hiawatha structure under the ice has already been demonstrated (Figure 1a) (Kenny et al, 2022;Kjaer et al, 2018), and here, we therefore refer to the crater as the Hiawatha impact structure herein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact record on Earth affords opportunities to investigate hypervelocity impact craters in the field and laboratory, thus providing important ground‐truth data for improving our understanding of the impact cratering process and enabling the interpretation of data from other planetary bodies. There are currently 201 confirmed impact craters and hypervelocity impact craters on Earth (Osinski et al., 2022), of which 32 are in Canada. Many of these Canadian impact sites remain poorly studied, which can be attributed to the fact that many are located in remote parts of northern Canada and have been rarely visited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%