2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144689
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact dynamics on SLIPS: Effects of liquid droplet’s surface tension and viscosity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…345 This is mostly true with LIS, with several reports supporting this scaling. 60,64,150,158 Droplet impacts do not always follow this scaling, however, with droplets with a higher viscosity than water showing a scaling closer to We 1/5 . 150,158 LIS and superhydrophobic surfaces exhibit similar properties, but the presence of the lubricant layer causes several differences in how droplets impact.…”
Section: Droplet Impactmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…345 This is mostly true with LIS, with several reports supporting this scaling. 60,64,150,158 Droplet impacts do not always follow this scaling, however, with droplets with a higher viscosity than water showing a scaling closer to We 1/5 . 150,158 LIS and superhydrophobic surfaces exhibit similar properties, but the presence of the lubricant layer causes several differences in how droplets impact.…”
Section: Droplet Impactmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…60,64,150,158 Droplet impacts do not always follow this scaling, however, with droplets with a higher viscosity than water showing a scaling closer to We 1/5 . 150,158 LIS and superhydrophobic surfaces exhibit similar properties, but the presence of the lubricant layer causes several differences in how droplets impact. The most notable of these is that LIS have higher static adhesion, so droplets generally do not bounce off the surface of LIS.…”
Section: Droplet Impactmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the past few decades, extensive studies have been devoted to studying the maximum spreading factor experimentally, numerically, and theoretically. It is acknowledged that the impact dynamics are generally characterized by three dimensionless numbers: Weber number We = ρU 0 2 D 0 /γ, Reynolds number Re = ρU 0 D 0 /μ, and Ohnesorge number Oh = We 1/2 / Re . Here ρ, μ, γ, and U 0 represent the density, viscosity, surface tension, and impact velocity, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previous work of Pasandideh-Fard et al and Ukiwe et al facilitated development of the theoretical model of maximum spreading factor. Since then, eqs and have been widely applied to impact dynamics study on smooth surfaces, and various theoretical models of the maximum spreading factor on microstructured and chemically patterned surfaces have been proposed. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their results showed that, while rough surfaces promote droplet instabilities during the spreading, lubricant infusion on the surface damps the droplet's interfacial vibrations during its spreading and retraction phases. Baek et al 37 showed that surface tension and viscosity play important roles in droplet impact dynamics, and liquid viscosity and surface tension are the control parameters to change the maximum spreading radius and contact time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%