2016
DOI: 10.1109/tmech.2016.2569466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact Dynamic Modeling and Adaptive Target Capturing Control for Tethered Space Robots With Uncertainties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reliably on non-graspable objects, with an average success rate of 86% in the capturing tasks. Furthermore, with the qualitative comparative analysis, the proposed method has the following advantages: 1) Compared with tether nets [18], [19], tether grippers [20], [21], and unit-type caging methods [22], the proposed end-effectors are affixed at the end of robotic arms to form a combined cage; hence, is a simpler and easier-to-implement caging method with high reusability and reliability. 2) For a robotic tentacle [23], it is difficult to capture the non-graspable object in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The reliably on non-graspable objects, with an average success rate of 86% in the capturing tasks. Furthermore, with the qualitative comparative analysis, the proposed method has the following advantages: 1) Compared with tether nets [18], [19], tether grippers [20], [21], and unit-type caging methods [22], the proposed end-effectors are affixed at the end of robotic arms to form a combined cage; hence, is a simpler and easier-to-implement caging method with high reusability and reliability. 2) For a robotic tentacle [23], it is difficult to capture the non-graspable object in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the vacuum and high-temperature-difference environment and practical factors such as weight and volume restriction requirements, these methods [14]- [16] are impracticable for grasping non-graspable objects in space [17]. For dealing with this class of objects, two main strategies are employed: One is to use flexible capturing theories and methods, including tether nets [18], [19], tether grippers [20], [21], robotic capsules [22] and robotic tentacles [23]; the other is to capture objects using robotic arms with customized capture effectors, of which end-effectors are the most important tools as they can directly determine the success of tasks [24]. An innovative strategy is proposed for adhering directly to the surfaces of objects and an electro-adhesive gripper [17] and a gecko-inspired adhesive gripper [3] are d e v el o pe d f o r ca p t u ri n g n o n -g ra sp a bl e o b je cts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…11,12 In addition, target capture is an essential and key mission for the tethered space robot, which requires controlling a gripper, a space tether and a space platform at the same time. [13][14][15] Using those techniques, a single operator has to adopt multiple cooperated patterns to complete the complex operational tasks. In order to avoid investing extra manpower and material resources, it has become necessary to find a new way to increase sources for generating control signals and efficiently representing their control intentions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tethered space robot (TSR) systems consist of a gripper, a space tether and a space platform ( Figure 1) for future use in on-orbit services, such as on-orbit maintenance, on-orbit refuelling, auxiliary orbit transfer and space debris removal [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Many problems may arise during the TSR capture mission that is usually separated into deployment, approach, capture and postcapture phases [7,8] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%