2005
DOI: 10.3166/sda.25.381-395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact de la technologie et des conditions du foisonnement sur l’élaboration de mousses laitières de type « topping »

Abstract: Impact of technology and whipping conditions on dairy topping fabricationThe continuous manufacturing of dairy toppings has been studied using first the conventional industrial technology, the axial rotor-stator mixer. The influence of process parameters including operating pressure, residence time and rotational speed has been investigated in terms of overrun, bubble size distribution, as well as foam texture and stability using a model dairy emulsion. The performance of the rotor-stator mixer has then been c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Vinckier, Moldenaers, Terracciano, & Grizzuti, 1998). For s = 40 s, Eff was 100%, mainly because the increase of the actual residence time due to pressurised conditions is counterbalanced by the decrease of the apparent residence time s from 120 s to 40 s. This result is in perfect agreement with data already reported by Labbafi et al (2005) on aerated dairy desserts: under pressure, gas dispersion in the RS unit is easier, but must be achieved at a lower apparent residence time in order to avoid overwhipping.…”
Section: Overrunsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Vinckier, Moldenaers, Terracciano, & Grizzuti, 1998). For s = 40 s, Eff was 100%, mainly because the increase of the actual residence time due to pressurised conditions is counterbalanced by the decrease of the apparent residence time s from 120 s to 40 s. This result is in perfect agreement with data already reported by Labbafi et al (2005) on aerated dairy desserts: under pressure, gas dispersion in the RS unit is easier, but must be achieved at a lower apparent residence time in order to avoid overwhipping.…”
Section: Overrunsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Djelveh & Gros, 1995;Hanselmann & Windhab, 1999;Thakur, Vial, & Djelveh, 2003;Müller-Fischer & Windhab, 2005;Indrawati, Wang, & Narsimhan, 2008b;Indrawati, Wang, Narsimhan, & Gonzalez, 2008a;Narchi, Vial, & Djelveh, 2007). In the food industry, aeration is typically carried out in axial rotor-stator mixers, using rotor and stator fitted with rows of pins (Hanselmann & Windhab, 1999;Labbafi et al, 2005;Müller-Fischer & Windhab, 2005), except for ice cream for which scraped surface heat exchangers prevail. From a practical point of view, rotor-stator devices are usually operated at high speed under pressure in the industry, although there is no proof that such a high shear and an energy input are required for aeration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present work is devoted to the analysis of a rotor‐stator geometry dedicated to this application. Only a dozen of papers can be found in the literature on this topic, although it covers different fields within the industry, such as textile treatments, but also the production of aerated food (e.g., whipped cream, ice cream or chocolate mousse) or cosmetic products . Another application of foam generation involves the manufacture of aerated building material, but most data remain confined to the industry and can be found in patent applications (see, e.g., Demanet and Valenti) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This stems probably from the differences in density, viscosity and interfacial properties between liquid‐liquid and gas‐liquid systems. As a result, there is a particular lack of information on the rotor‐stator devices specifically devoted to foam generation, although the power draw curves obtained in single‐phase flows are known to be useful for designing foam generation process . Among them, a simple design has been shown to be quite effective for in‐line aeration for various non‐Newtonian continuous phases and operating conditions, whereas it is reported to be poorly efficient for emulsion preparation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation