2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact damage characteristics in reinforced woven natural silk/epoxy composite face-sheet and sandwich foam, coremat and honeycomb materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in agreement with the observations on high velocity impact response of sandwich structures made of GFRP facesheets and polyurethane foams [24] and high velocity impact behaviour of metallic sandwich panels with aluminium foam core [16]. However, it was found that the energy absorption decreased as the impact load increased in the low velocity impact tests on sandwich panels made of woven natural silk/epoxy composite facesheet and three different core materials [21], which is contrary to the trend observed here. The absorbed energy is a combination of energy for the plastic yielding and perforation of the facesheet as well as the crushing and failure processes in the core.…”
Section: Energy Absorptionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is in agreement with the observations on high velocity impact response of sandwich structures made of GFRP facesheets and polyurethane foams [24] and high velocity impact behaviour of metallic sandwich panels with aluminium foam core [16]. However, it was found that the energy absorption decreased as the impact load increased in the low velocity impact tests on sandwich panels made of woven natural silk/epoxy composite facesheet and three different core materials [21], which is contrary to the trend observed here. The absorbed energy is a combination of energy for the plastic yielding and perforation of the facesheet as well as the crushing and failure processes in the core.…”
Section: Energy Absorptionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…It is generally accepted that low velocity impact are impacts at velocities below 10 m/s, medium velocity impact has velocities ranging from 10 to 50 m/s, and high velocity impact occurs in the 50 to 1000 m/s velocity range [18,19]. While low velocity impact [14,15,[20][21][22][23] and high velocity impact [4,16,24] response of sandwich panels are well represented in the literature, the response of sandwich panels subjected to medium velocity impacts has rarely been studied experimentally. In this paper, sandwich panels with aluminium facesheets and five different core materials are impacted at different energies using a medium velocity gas gun and a comparison based on the force-displacement response and failure modes of the panels is presented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar trend has been reported by Ude et al [29] where they have investigated the degree of damage inflicted on the reinforced composite face-sheet and sandwich foam, core materials used in sandwich panels. The extent of damage varies for flax/UP post impacted specimens depending on incident energy level applied ( Table 2).…”
Section: Impact Damage Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This is attributed to their lightweight, high flexural and transverse shear stiffness, and good environmental resistance over solid sections [1][2][3]. However, they are susceptible to low-velocity impacts, which would result a sudden structural destruction [4]. Synthetic foam consisting of fillers with hollow cores is one of the promising core materials for sandwiches, providing superior compressive strength, high damage tolerance and excellent energy absorption [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%