2017
DOI: 10.1111/maps.13001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact cratering as a cause of climate change, surface alteration, and resurfacing during the early history of Mars

Abstract: Ancient valley networks (VNs) and related open‐ and closed‐basin lakes are testimony to the presence of flowing liquid water on the surface of Mars in the Late Noachian and Early Hesperian. Uncertain, however, has been the mechanism responsible for causing the necessary rainfall and runoff and/or snowfall and subsequent melting. Impact cratering has been proposed (e.g., Segura et al. 2002) as a process for temporarily raising temperatures and inducing conditions that would produce rainfall, snowmelt, runoff, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
26
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
(774 reference statements)
2
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Like other examples presented in this work, this Noachian-aged unit exhibits higher TI than the Hesperian-aged Syrtis Major lavas that overlie the unit (Figure 2d). We thus suggest that the Nili Fossae olivine-bearing unit is friable compared to Syrtis lavas and argue that this favors pyroclastic, detrital sedimentary, or impact-related origins (e.g., Palumbo & Head, 2017). Unaltered regions are found within 300 km distance and within a few hundred meter elevation from the Syrtis lavas, suggesting that preferential wind activity cannot explain the differences in TI and regolith cover between unaltered olivine bedrock and Syrtis lavas.…”
Section: Implications For Mars 2020 Landing Sitesmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Like other examples presented in this work, this Noachian-aged unit exhibits higher TI than the Hesperian-aged Syrtis Major lavas that overlie the unit (Figure 2d). We thus suggest that the Nili Fossae olivine-bearing unit is friable compared to Syrtis lavas and argue that this favors pyroclastic, detrital sedimentary, or impact-related origins (e.g., Palumbo & Head, 2017). Unaltered regions are found within 300 km distance and within a few hundred meter elevation from the Syrtis lavas, suggesting that preferential wind activity cannot explain the differences in TI and regolith cover between unaltered olivine bedrock and Syrtis lavas.…”
Section: Implications For Mars 2020 Landing Sitesmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Large, basin-scale impacts (e.g., Isidis, Argyre, and Hellas) could have produced olivine-bearing clastic rocks in the form of suevites, and also potentially as condensates from silicate vapor created during the impact (Toon et al, 2010). Indeed, previous authors have suggested that the Nili Fossae and Isidis olivine-bearing bedrock plains units may represent the silicate condensate (Palumbo & Head, 2017) or impact melt (Mustard et al, 2007) from the Isidis basin impact. Indeed, previous authors have suggested that the Nili Fossae and Isidis olivine-bearing bedrock plains units may represent the silicate condensate (Palumbo & Head, 2017) or impact melt (Mustard et al, 2007) from the Isidis basin impact.…”
Section: Potential Origin(s) Of Bedrock Plains and Causes Of Olivine mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For almost 50 years now, various gaseous and cloud greenhouse solutions have been proposed only to be discounted upon closer scrutiny (see Haberle et al, for a detailed discussion). Transient warm episodes driven by impacts (Segura et al, , , ), volcanism (Halevy & Head, ; Schmidt et al, ), seasonal effects (Kite et al, ; Palumbo et al, ), climate limit cycles (Batalha et al, ), or methane‐hydrogen bursts (Chassefière et al, 2016) on an otherwise cold icy planet (Wordsworth et al, ) have been proposed, but these mechanisms have been challenged as well (e.g., Barnhart et al, ; Hoke et al, ; Kerber et al, ; Ramirez, ; Palumbo & Head, ; Steakley et al, ; Turbet, Gillmann, et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%