Ravine Lands: Greening for Livelihood and Environmental Security 2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-8043-2_24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact Assessment of Management Techniques Implemented in Chambal Ravines, Madhya Pradesh, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such indicators are sympatric and usually identify vulnerability at local level (Jha et al 2017 ). Vulnerability assessment approaches such as multidimensional vulnerability (Sullivan and Meigh 2005 ), Livelihood Vulnerability Index (Hahn et al 2009 ), Livelihood Effect Index (Urothody and Larsen 2010 ), Climate Vulnerability Index (Pandey and Jha 2011 ), Capacity Assessment Index (Jha et al 2017 ), and Vulnerability and Capacity Assessment (Sinha and Jha 2017 ) aggregate the indicators for the respective components and exemplify sectoral and overall vulnerability. In the present assessment, we combined biophysical and socioeconomic indicators and attempted to formulate an approach that can identify vulnerable communities.…”
Section: Analytical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such indicators are sympatric and usually identify vulnerability at local level (Jha et al 2017 ). Vulnerability assessment approaches such as multidimensional vulnerability (Sullivan and Meigh 2005 ), Livelihood Vulnerability Index (Hahn et al 2009 ), Livelihood Effect Index (Urothody and Larsen 2010 ), Climate Vulnerability Index (Pandey and Jha 2011 ), Capacity Assessment Index (Jha et al 2017 ), and Vulnerability and Capacity Assessment (Sinha and Jha 2017 ) aggregate the indicators for the respective components and exemplify sectoral and overall vulnerability. In the present assessment, we combined biophysical and socioeconomic indicators and attempted to formulate an approach that can identify vulnerable communities.…”
Section: Analytical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As this review does not aim to expound the various types of gully prevention and rehabilitation measures or the integrated watershed development projects that are implemented in the badlands, we direct the interested reader to consult the guidelines of the IISWC (ICAR-CSWCRTI, 2014; as well as recent reviews on badlands rehabilitation techniques and their effects (Bhan and Arora, 2018;Sikka et al, 2018;Soni et al, 2018;Tomar and Verma, 2018;Verma et al, 2018;Kumar, Adhikary and Dash, 2020), essays on nutrient management approaches for soil health improvement (Dey et al, 2018;Verma and Singh, 2018) and discourses on economic viability, public perception, policy dimensions and ground-level applicability of the badlands management strategies (Balooni, 2003, Dagar andSingh, 2018;Mishra et al, 2018;Pande et al, 2018a,b) specific to India.…”
Section: System and Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%