2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.03.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact and effectiveness of meningococcal C conjugate vaccine following its introduction in Spain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
72
0
19

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
5
72
0
19
Order By: Relevance
“…21 This is supported by data reported to ECDC, 1 according to which the proportion of SgC IMD among all serogrouped IMD cases in 2009 was 0% in Iceland, 0.5% in the UK, 5.1% in the Netherlands, 3.7% in Ireland, and 1.8% in Portugal, where catch-up campaigns targeted all persons up to 18 years or even older. In contrast, in Spain, where catch-up vaccination was limited to children 5 years and younger in 16/19 regions 22 and Belgium, 23 where catch up was limited to 1-6 year-olds in French regions and to 1-6 year olds and 15-18 year-olds in Flanders, the proportion of SgC IMD was higher at 7.1% and 13.8%, respectively, but still lower than in Germany (21.9%) or in countries that did not implement SgC vaccination before 2010, e.g. France (22.7%) or Denmark (32.8%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 This is supported by data reported to ECDC, 1 according to which the proportion of SgC IMD among all serogrouped IMD cases in 2009 was 0% in Iceland, 0.5% in the UK, 5.1% in the Netherlands, 3.7% in Ireland, and 1.8% in Portugal, where catch-up campaigns targeted all persons up to 18 years or even older. In contrast, in Spain, where catch-up vaccination was limited to children 5 years and younger in 16/19 regions 22 and Belgium, 23 where catch up was limited to 1-6 year-olds in French regions and to 1-6 year olds and 15-18 year-olds in Flanders, the proportion of SgC IMD was higher at 7.1% and 13.8%, respectively, but still lower than in Germany (21.9%) or in countries that did not implement SgC vaccination before 2010, e.g. France (22.7%) or Denmark (32.8%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11][12][13][14] As also observed by Mooney et al 14 , the reversal of the increasing trend of serogroup C related IMD was simultaneous with the timing of MCC introduction and, therefore, likely attributable to it. The impact of MCC was investigated in many other European and Italian regional studies [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] which showed an important decrease in N. meningitidis C related IMD and a vaccine effectiveness as high as 100% depending on the age group and on the time elapsed from vaccination. A downward trend in serogroup C related IMD was also confirmed by the European Center for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) in countries with MCC vaccination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is interesting and unique that their introduction was initiated without any evidence of the vaccines' efficacy (it was extrapolated from polysaccharide vaccines), only with safety and immunogenicity confirmation (Miller et al, 2001). MCC vaccines apart from dramatic decrease of the incidence of MenC IMD in vaccinees, reduced also nasopharyngeal carriage, resulted in desirable herd immunity effect (Campbell et al, 2009;Larrauri et al, 2005;Miller et al, 2001). Consequently, the vaccine was successively introduced into national immunization programmes in some other European countries as well as in Australia, Canada and South America (Halperin et al, 2012;Jafri et al, 2013).…”
Section: St-11ccmentioning
confidence: 99%