This essay critically analyzes "Views from the chalkface: English language school-based assessment in Hong Kong," a published study by Davison (2007). The conceptual framework of this essay draws on Stanley, MacCann, Gardner, Reynolds, and Wild's (2009) "Review of teacher assessment: Evidence of what works best and issues for development" and Cheng, Andrews, and Yu's (2011) "Impact and consequences of school-based assessment (SBA): Students' and parents' views of SBA in Hong Kong." "Review" is used to critique Davison's methods and claims, whereas "Impact" is used to evaluate his findings. The essay ends with the writer's experiences in both monitoring and implementing SBA while he was serving as the English panel head of a band-three secondary school.
Keywords: School-Based Assessment, HKCEE, Assessment evaluationInternational Journal of Education ISSN 1948-5476 2015 www.macrothink.org/ije 96
IntroductionThis essay will primarily focus on analyzing Davison (2007) article "Views from the chalkface: English language school-based assessment in Hong Kong", on the basis on the conceptual framework drawn on two works from Stanley, MacCann, Gardner, Reynolds, and Wild's (2009) and Cheng, Andrews, and Yu's (2011). The first paper will be utilized to evaluate Davison's claims and methods whilst the second paper is adopted to review his findings. A conclusion including the writer's frontline experience in conducting SBA will be given.
Summary of Davison's 2007 studyDavison's article was published when the Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority (HKEAA) transformed the university entry examination, namely, the Hong Kong Certificate of Education Examination (HKCEE), from norm-referenced to standard-referenced. This transformation introduced a school-based oral assessment component, namely, School-Based Assessment (SBA), to the classroom. Such an unprecedented transformation of the assessment framework aroused concern among various stakeholders with regard to sociocultural, technical, and practical issues, given that SBA was the first step of the unification of assessment and curriculum reform by the Education and Manpower Bureau. Davison's article focuses on these issues by outlining the rationale and framework of the SBA component, reviewing analyses of how teachers and students view SBA during the pilot stage of SBA implementation, and proposing possible research on fostering the skills and fundamental knowledge of teachers in relation to SBA.3. Stanley, MacCann, Gardner, Reynolds, and Wild's study as theoretical framework Davison (2007) suggested that the emergence of SBA can be classified into three separate directions, namely, sociocultural, technical, and practical issues, with the new assessment skeleton. Therefore, Stanley et al.'s "Review," which traces how assessment innovation has been reformed globally, can be used to dissect Davison's spectrum and determine how the practical and theoretical perspectives in a globalized arena can be streamed to a localized one.
Limitations of Stanley, MacCann,...