1982
DOI: 10.1007/bf00200198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunosuppressive effect of acute-phase reactant proteins in vitro and its relevance to cancer

Abstract: Acute-phase reactant proteins reach abnormally high levels in patients with cancer, and correlate with the extent of disease. In this study, several acute-phase glycoproteins, and serum albumin as a control, were tested at different concentrations for their ability to modify the blastogenic response of lymphocytes from 30 normal donors to PHA and the chemotactic response of monocytes from 15 normal donors to casein. In high concentrations approximating those found in cancer patients, but not in normal concentr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, as APPs may not be NB-specific signatures for advanced disease, it has been postulated that APPs may exert a tumor-mediated immune suppression. Reports have implicated APPs acting as non-specific blocking factors protecting tumors against the host's immunological attack [33][34][35]. This notion is indirectly supported by our results which show overexpression of serum APPs in an animal NB progression model and preliminary human NB samples.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Nevertheless, as APPs may not be NB-specific signatures for advanced disease, it has been postulated that APPs may exert a tumor-mediated immune suppression. Reports have implicated APPs acting as non-specific blocking factors protecting tumors against the host's immunological attack [33][34][35]. This notion is indirectly supported by our results which show overexpression of serum APPs in an animal NB progression model and preliminary human NB samples.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…It was reported that an increased level of CER together with that of aAT and AaG can exert an immunosuppressive effect [14], However, in our study, only CER was found to be elevated and therefore such a synergic immunosuppressive effect cannot be expected.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…The aAT has an inhibiting effect on macrophages and inhibits lymphocyte proliferation to phytohemagglutinin (PHA) [12], The latter effect seems to be due to a decreased production of IL-1 by macrophages [13]. A synergic effect of these proteins was also demonstrated; when added to lymphocytes cultures, AaG, aAT and CER exert an inhibiting effect on lymphocyte proliferation at concentrations which are lower than those necessary to obtain the same effect when only one protein is added [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A synthetic peptide corresponding to the 34 N-terminal residues of the predicted HPR gene product (4) was synthesized by the Protein Chemistry Facility on an Applied Biosystems model 43A peptide synthesizer (15). Because histidine coupling is inefficient, lysine was conservatively substituted for the histidine in position 28. For immunization, the peptide was conjugated to keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) (Boehringer Mannheim) essentially as described (16).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%