2015
DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000000650
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunosuppression Modifications Based on an Immune Response Assay

Abstract: Immune function testing provided additional data which helped optimize immunosuppression and improve patient outcomes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
65
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
4
65
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, simple and non-invasive immunomonitoring methods are required as markers for early stage cancer or tumor recurrence. Although several systems have been shown to strongly predict poor prognosis (19)(20)(21), personalized medicine requires the establishment of tumor-specific immunomonitoring systems for predicting tumor recurrence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, simple and non-invasive immunomonitoring methods are required as markers for early stage cancer or tumor recurrence. Although several systems have been shown to strongly predict poor prognosis (19)(20)(21), personalized medicine requires the establishment of tumor-specific immunomonitoring systems for predicting tumor recurrence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Survival outcomes after LT have constantly improved using upgraded immunosuppressive agents [165]. However, the inadequate or excessive immunosuppression is associated with a higher risk of rejection, higher incidence of infection, drug toxicity, and increased mortality [166][167][168][169][170]. Experimental studies in rats have investigated the effect of immunosuppressive agents on the intestinal microbiota in LT.…”
Section: Gut Microbiota and Hepatic Ischemia Reperfusion In Liver Surmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The immunosuppression protocol was tacrolimus and tapering steroids in all patients, although additional immunosuppressants were permitted. The interventional arm had reduced trough concentration of tacrolimus, which resulted in less infections (42% vs. 54.9%; P < 0.05), with similar biopsy‐proven ACR rates (19% vs. 13.7%; P = NS), and improved survival rates at 12 months (95% vs. 82%; P < 0.01) . Although it seems that Immuknow adds some information to liver tests and trough concentrations of CNI, more studies are warranted to confirm these observations.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 89%