1995
DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1995.01430120099015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunosuppression Augments Growth of Graft-Adherent Staphylococcus epidermidis

Abstract: Suppression of immune function during graft implantation augmented growth of adherent bacteria. The effect of short-term perioperative immunosuppression on late-appearing S epidermidis graft infection needs further study.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…time (4,23). A potential solution to these drawbacks is to use biophotonic imaging, as first described by Contag et al (8) and later by Burns et al (6) for monitoring gram-negative bacterial infections.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…time (4,23). A potential solution to these drawbacks is to use biophotonic imaging, as first described by Contag et al (8) and later by Burns et al (6) for monitoring gram-negative bacterial infections.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,6,7 Staphylococci on prosthetic valves and central venous catheters are most often found in biofilms, especially Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus. During the first year of postvalve replacement, staphylococci in biofilms are responsible for 65% of postwound infections.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 Peptides were spontaneously bound to the graft, and efficacy was compared with that of rifampin, a commonly used antibiotic in graft precoating. 7 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coagulase-negative staphylococci are among the most common pathogens that cause biomaterial infections. In particular, Staphylococcus epidermidis, a commensal organism of the skin, is the most frequent cause of late-appearing vascular graft infection in humans (1)(2)(3)21). Effective strategies for the prevention of prosthetic infection vary from device to device.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%