1987
DOI: 10.1007/bf00193894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunoresponses to Neisseria meningitidis epitopes: Immunodulation by meningococcus B acts on more than one meningococcal surface epitope

Abstract: Neisseria meningitidis group B strain M986 (serotypes 2a, 7) (NMB) elicits a specific primary antiphosphorylcholine immune response in mice but not a secondary response. The ability of other serotype and serogroup meningococci to induce similar primary responses in mice was studied, as was the immunogenicity of trinitrophenyl coupled NMB (TNP-NMB) in primary and secondary antitrinitrophenyl responses. Except for NMB, all other strains tested (three serogroup B and one serogroup A meningococcal strains) were fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although suppression might be due to an antibody-dependent mechanism [45], this would imply that the immune response to other PC antigens should also be suppressed in NMBprimed mice, and this is not the case [15]. Moreover, this suppression does not seem to be due either to anti-NMB antibodies or to the so-called epitope-specific suppression [23 ], because the suppression is detected only when the epitope is present in the carrier in both the priming and the challenge [16]. Therefore, a more likely explanation is that suppression is due to NMB-primed non-B, non-T radioresistant cells; of these, the best cell candidate appears to be macrophages or macrophage-like cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although suppression might be due to an antibody-dependent mechanism [45], this would imply that the immune response to other PC antigens should also be suppressed in NMBprimed mice, and this is not the case [15]. Moreover, this suppression does not seem to be due either to anti-NMB antibodies or to the so-called epitope-specific suppression [23 ], because the suppression is detected only when the epitope is present in the carrier in both the priming and the challenge [16]. Therefore, a more likely explanation is that suppression is due to NMB-primed non-B, non-T radioresistant cells; of these, the best cell candidate appears to be macrophages or macrophage-like cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inoculation of mice with outer membrane vesicles from both encapsulated and non-encapsulated M986 strains has been shown to provide protection against lethal doses of endotoxin and infective doses of live bacteria (19). These strains have also been used to investigate immune regulatory properties of N. meningitidis (26,27) and both LOS and outer membrane vesicles enhance granulocyte recovery in myelosuppressed mice (22).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some antigenic preparations of N. meningitidis can induce a phosphorylcholine-specific response acting as a type 2 T-independent antigen (7) and can modulate this immunoresponse by causing carrier-specific suppression of the secondary response against natural and chemically bound meningococcal epitopes (7)(8)(9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neisseria meningitidis group B as much other Gramnegative bacteria is a complex and particulate antigen able to elicit multiple immunomodulatory mechanisms at both molecular and cellular immunological level such as secretion of IgA proteases (22). Some antigenic preparations of N. meningitidis can induce a phosphorylcholine-specific response acting as a type 2 T-independent antigen (7) and can modulate this immunoresponse by causing carrier-specific suppression of the secondary response against natural and chemically bound meningococcal epitopes (7)(8)(9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%