2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunological Signatures after Bordetella pertussis Infection Demonstrate Importance of Pulmonary Innate Immune Cells

Abstract: Effective immunity against Bordetella pertussis is currently under discussion following the stacking evidence of pertussis resurgence in the vaccinated population. Natural immunity is more effective than vaccine-induced immunity indicating that knowledge on infection-induced responses may contribute to improve vaccination strategies. We applied a systems biology approach comprising microarray, flow cytometry and multiplex immunoassays to unravel the molecular and cellular signatures in unprotected mice and pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, given the differences in the rates of clearance of Ftt and B. pertussis, the flavor and complexity of in vivo activation of T cells is likely to profoundly impact the function of IV 2 T cells. For example, B. pertussis elicits a greater inflammatory response soon postinfection, whereas Ftt fails to trigger detectable inflammation for up to 3 d after inoculation (16,17). Therefore, although ex vivo stimulation results in minor changes in the metabolic profile of IV 2 CD4 + T eff independent of the vaccinating bacterium, our data suggest that the nature of secondary infection may contribute to the overall efficacy of the resident T cell response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…For example, given the differences in the rates of clearance of Ftt and B. pertussis, the flavor and complexity of in vivo activation of T cells is likely to profoundly impact the function of IV 2 T cells. For example, B. pertussis elicits a greater inflammatory response soon postinfection, whereas Ftt fails to trigger detectable inflammation for up to 3 d after inoculation (16,17). Therefore, although ex vivo stimulation results in minor changes in the metabolic profile of IV 2 CD4 + T eff independent of the vaccinating bacterium, our data suggest that the nature of secondary infection may contribute to the overall efficacy of the resident T cell response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…11 This response is comparable to the response induced by a B. pertussis infection, but importantly lacks the mucosal immune responses. 8,[12][13][14] Vaccine administration directly into the respiratory tract provides better protection, compared with intramuscular administration, because of its induction of local immune responses. [15][16][17][18] Protection against B. pertussis challenge has been achieved with various intranasal pertussis vaccine candidates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 However, more recently, Raeven et al 29 have shown that pulmonary immunization with pertussis outer membrane vesicles induced superior protection than subcutaneous immunization and this was related to mucosal IgA and Th17 cell induction. The same authors have shown that mucosal IgA and Th1/Th17 cells are also induced by experimental infection of mice with virulent B. pertussis, 30 and Th1/Th17 cells have been demonstrated to be crucial for protection induced by infection. 31 Furthermore, Wilk et al 23 and Misiak et al 32 have reported that infection with virulent B. pertussis induces tissue-resident IL-17-producing CD4 and γδ T cells in the lungs of mice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%