Immunological responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in kidney transplant recipients

Prendecki, Maria; Thomson, Tina; Clarke, Candice; Martin, Paul L.; Gleeson, Sarah; Aguiar, Rute; Edwards, Helena; Mortimer, Paige M; McIntyre, Stacey; Mokreri, Donald; Cox, Alison; Pickard, Graham; Lightstone, Liz; Thomas, David; McAdoo, Stephen P; Kelleher, Peter; Willicombe, Michelle

doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)02096-1

Cited by 65 publications

(86 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“… 37 A previous report has described stronger serological responses to the BNT162b2 vaccine compared with ChAdOx1-S in SOT recipients, with similar T-cell responses. 16 Studies of other immunocompromised cohorts have similarly detailed stronger antispike protein immunoglobulin G responses following BNT162b2 vaccination when compared with ChAdOx1-S. 38 Our finding that only the ChAdOx1-S vaccine was associated with a statistically significant reduction in risk of death is therefore unexpected and merits closer consideration. It is possible that our study was underpowered to detect a protective effect of the BNT162b2 vaccine in this study cohort or that those with additional risk factors for COVID-19–related death that we were unable to adjust for were more likely to receive the BNT162b2 vaccine.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 82%

Real-world Effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 and Oxford-AstraZeneca ChAdOx1-S Vaccines Against SARS-CoV-2 in Solid Organ and Islet Transplant Recipients

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background. The clinical effectiveness of vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in immunosuppressed solid organ and islet transplant (SOT) recipients is unclear. Methods. We linked 4 national registries to retrospectively identify laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections and deaths within 28 d in England between September 1, 2020, and August 31, 2021, comparing unvaccinated adult SOT recipients and those who had received 2 doses of ChAdOx1-S or BNT162b2 vaccine. Infection incidence rate ratios were adjusted for recipient demographics and calendar month using a negative binomial regression model, with 95% confidence intervals. Case fatality rate ratios were adjusted using a Cox proportional hazards model to generate hazard ratio (95% confidence interval). Results. On August 31, 2021, it was found that 3080 (7.1%) were unvaccinated, 1141 (2.6%) had 1 vaccine dose, and 39 260 (90.3%) had 2 vaccine doses. There were 4147 SARS-CoV-2 infections and 407 deaths (unadjusted case fatality rate 9.8%). The riskadjusted infection incidence rate ratio was 1.29 (1.03-1.61), implying that vaccination was not associated with reduction in risk of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Overall, the hazard ratio for death within 28 d of SARS-CoV-2 infection was 0.80 (0.63-1.00), a 20% reduction in risk of death in vaccinated patients (P = 0.05). Two doses of ChAdOx1-S were associated with a significantly reduced risk of death (hazard ratio, 0.69; 0.52-0.92), whereas vaccination with BNT162b2 was not (0.97; 0.71-1.31). Conclusions. Vaccination of SOT recipients confers some protection against SARS-CoV-2-related mortality, but this protection is inferior to that achieved in the general population. SOT recipients require additional protective measures, including further vaccine doses, antiviral drugs, and nonpharmaceutical interventions. (Transplantation 2022;106: 436-446).

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 82%

Real-world Effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 and Oxford-AstraZeneca ChAdOx1-S Vaccines Against SARS-CoV-2 in Solid Organ and Islet Transplant Recipients

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Overall, 82 studies were included for meta-analysis ( table 1 , supplementary table 2). 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Efficacy of covid-19 vaccines in immunocompromised patients: systematic review and meta-analysis

Lee

Wong

Chai

et al. 2022

BMJ

348

313

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective To compare the efficacy of covid-19 vaccines between immunocompromised and immunocompetent people. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources PubMed, Embase, Central Register of Controlled Trials, COVID-19 Open Research Dataset Challenge (CORD-19), and WHO covid-19 databases for studies published between 1 December 2020 and 5 November 2021. ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were searched in November 2021 to identify registered but as yet unpublished or ongoing studies. Study selection Prospective observational studies comparing the efficacy of covid-19 vaccination in immunocompromised and immunocompetent participants. Methods A frequentist random effects meta-analysis was used to separately pool relative and absolute risks of seroconversion after the first and second doses of a covid-19 vaccine. Systematic review without meta-analysis of SARS-CoV-2 antibody titre levels was performed after first, second, and third vaccine doses and the seroconversion rate after a third dose. Risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed. Results 82 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Of these studies, 77 (94%) used mRNA vaccines, 16 (20%) viral vector vaccines, and 4 (5%) inactivated whole virus vaccines. 63 studies were assessed to be at low risk of bias and 19 at moderate risk of bias. After one vaccine dose, seroconversion was about half as likely in patients with haematological cancers (risk ratio 0.40, 95% confidence interval 0.32 to 0.50, I 2 =80%; absolute risk 0.29, 95% confidence interval 0.20 to 0.40, I 2 =89%), immune mediated inflammatory disorders (0.53, 0.39 to 0.71, I 2 =89%; 0.29, 0.11 to 0.58, I 2 =97%), and solid cancers (0.55, 0.46 to 0.65, I 2 =78%; 0.44, 0.36 to 0.53, I 2 =84%) compared with immunocompetent controls, whereas organ transplant recipients were 16 times less likely to seroconvert (0.06, 0.04 to 0.09, I 2 =0%; 0.06, 0.04 to 0.08, I 2 =0%). After a second dose, seroconversion remained least likely in transplant recipients (0.39, 0.32 to 0.46, I 2 =92%; 0.35, 0.26 to 0.46), with only a third achieving seroconversion. Seroconversion was increasingly likely in patients with haematological cancers (0.63, 0.57 to 0.69, I 2 =88%; 0.62, 0.54 to 0.70, I 2 =90%), immune mediated inflammatory disorders (0.75, 0.69 to 0.82, I 2 =92%; 0.77, 0.66 to 0.85, I 2 =93%), and solid cancers (0.90, 0.88 to 0.93, I 2 =51%; 0.89, 0.86 to 0.91, I 2 =49%). Seroconversion was similar between people with HIV and immunocompetent controls (1.00, 0.98 to 1.01, I 2 =0%; 0.97, 0.83 to 1.00, I 2 =89%). Systematic review of 11 studies showed that a third dose of a covid-19 mRNA vaccine was associated with seroconversion among vaccine non-responders with solid cancers, haematological cancers, and immune mediated inflammatory disorders, although response was variable in transplant recipients and inadequately studied in people with HIV and those receiving non-mRNA vaccines. Conclusion Seroconversion rates after covid-19 vaccination were significantly lower in immunocompromised patients, especially organ transplant recipients. A second dose was associated with consistently improved seroconversion across all patient groups, albeit at a lower magnitude for organ transplant recipients. Targeted interventions for immunocompromised patients, including a third (booster) dose, should be performed. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42021272088.

show abstract

“…Among several COVID-19 vaccines available, a third dose of an mRNA-based vaccine appeared to substantially improve the prevalence of anti–SARS-CoV-2 antibodies from 40 to 68% after a regular 2-dose course in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients 26 – 29 . KT recipients who received an adenovirus-vectored vaccine revealed a significantly impaired immune response rate of 44% after a full course 30 . Data regarding an additional dose after an entire course of the adenovirus-vectored vaccine in SOT recipients remains limited.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Immunogenicity of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine after a two-dose inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccination of dialysis patients and kidney transplant recipients

Bruminhent

Setthaudom

Kitpermkiat

et al. 2022

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Vaccination with inactivated SARS-CoV-2 virus produces suboptimal immune responses among kidney transplant (KT), peritoneal dialyzed (PD), and hemodialyzed (HD) patients. Participants were vaccinated with two-dose inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (V2) and a third dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (V3) at 1–2 months after V2. We enrolled 106 participants: 31 KT, 28 PD, and 31 HD patients and 16 controls. Among KT, PD, and HD groups, median (IQR) of anti-receptor binding domain antibody levels were 1.0 (0.4–26.8), 1092.5 (606.9–1927.2), and 1740.9 (1106–3762.3) BAU/mL, and percent neutralization was 0.9 (0–9.9), 98.8 (95.9–99.5), and 99.4 (98.8–99.7), respectively, at two weeks after V3. Both parameters were significantly increased from V2 across all groups (p < 0.05). Seroconversion and neutralization positivity rates in PD, HD, and control groups were 100% but were impaired in KT patients (39% and 16%, respectively). S1-specific T-cell counts were increased in PD and HD groups (p < 0.05) but not in KT patients. The positive S1-specific T-cell responder rate was > 90% in PD, HD, and control groups, which was higher than that in KT recipients (74%, p < 0.05). The heterologous inactivated virus/ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination strategy elicited greater immunogenicity among dialysis patients; however, inadequate responses remained among KT recipients (TCTR20210226002).

show abstract

Immunological responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in kidney transplant recipients

Cited by 65 publications

References 11 publications

Real-world Effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 and Oxford-AstraZeneca ChAdOx1-S Vaccines Against SARS-CoV-2 in Solid Organ and Islet Transplant Recipients

Real-world Effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 and Oxford-AstraZeneca ChAdOx1-S Vaccines Against SARS-CoV-2 in Solid Organ and Islet Transplant Recipients

Efficacy of covid-19 vaccines in immunocompromised patients: systematic review and meta-analysis

Immunogenicity of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine after a two-dose inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccination of dialysis patients and kidney transplant recipients

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About