2018
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.25274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunological monitoring for prediction of clinical response to antitumor vaccine therapy

Abstract: Immunotherapy has shown promising results in a variety of cancers, including melanoma. However, the responses to therapy are usually heterogeneous, and understanding the factors affecting clinical outcome is still not achieved. Here, we show that immunological monitoring of the vaccine therapy for melanoma patients may help to predict the clinical course of the disease.We studied cytokine profile of cellular Th1 (IL-2, IL-12, IFN-γ) and humoral Th2 (IL-4, IL-10) immune response, vascular endothelial growth fac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 42 We based our strategy for improving antitumor T cell responses on the observation that poly(I:C), used as an adjuvant in cancer vaccination, leads to T helper 1 (Th1) polarization, 43 which directly correlates with robust antitumor immunity in the clinic. 44 As poly(I:C) selectively activates TLR3, we attempted to construct an oncolytic vector virus with the capacity to activate the TLR3-IRF3 pathway after infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 42 We based our strategy for improving antitumor T cell responses on the observation that poly(I:C), used as an adjuvant in cancer vaccination, leads to T helper 1 (Th1) polarization, 43 which directly correlates with robust antitumor immunity in the clinic. 44 As poly(I:C) selectively activates TLR3, we attempted to construct an oncolytic vector virus with the capacity to activate the TLR3-IRF3 pathway after infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Other predictive factors such as the genomic signatures and metabolic profiles associated with ICI resistance are under preclinical and clinical evaluation, and some of them have shown encouraging results [ 154 ]. The presence of mutations of Janus kinase 2 (JAK2), beta2-microglobulin and serine/threonine kinase 11 (STK11) are some of the alterations that have recently emerged as potential predictors of low responsiveness to ICIs [ 155 , 156 , 157 ]. Heterozygosity in the HLA class I genotype, a characteristic that facilitates the presentation of a broader set of tumor antigens to T cells, is another possible response biomarker that has been demonstrated to confer a higher responsivity to ICIs in cancer patients [ 158 , 159 ].…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other predictive factors such as the genomic signatures and metabolic profiles associated with ICI resistance are under preclinical and clinical evaluation, and some of them have shown encouraging results [ 154 ]. The presence of mutations of Janus kinase 2 (JAK2), beta2-microglobulin and serine/threonine kinase 11 (STK11) are some of the alterations that have recently emerged as potential predictors of low responsiveness to ICIs [ 155 , 156 , 157 ].…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%