Purpose
To identify changes in retinal function and structure in persons with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), including the effects of panretinal photocoagulation (PRP).
Design
Cross-sectional study
Participants
30 adults who received PRP for PDR, 15 adults with untreated PDR, and 15 age-matched controls
Methods
Contrast sensitivity, frequency doubling perimetry (FDP), Humphrey visual fields, photostress recovery, and dark adaptation were assessed in all subjects. Fundus photography and macular spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) were also obtained. SD-OCT scans were semi-automatically segmented to quantify retinal layer thicknesses.
Main Outcome Measures
Visual function test results were compared between patients with PDR and PRP, untreated patients with PDR, and controls. Mean retinal layer thicknesses were also compared between groups. Correlation analyses were performed to evaluate associations between visual function test results and retinal layer thicknesses.
Results
Patients with PDR exhibited significant reduction of FDP mean deviation (MD) in PRP-treated (MD ± SD: −8.20 ± 5.76 dB, p<0.0001) and untreated (−5.48 ± 4.48 dB, p<0.0001) patients relative to controls (1.07 ± 2.50 dB). Reduced log contrast sensitivity compared with controls (1.80 ± 0.14) was also observed in both PRP-treated (1.42 ± 0.17, p<0.0001) and untreated (1.56 ± 0.20, p= 0.001) patients with PDR. Compared to controls, patients treated with PRP demonstrated increased photostress recovery time (151.02 ± 104.43 sec vs 70.64 ± 47.14 sec, p=0.001) and dark adaptation speed (12.80 ± 5.15 min vs 9.74 ± 2.56 min, p=0.022) whereas untreated patients had no significant differences in photostress recovery time or dark adaptation speed relative to controls. PRP-treated patients had diffusely thickened nerve fiber layers (p=0.024) and diffusely thinned retinal pigment epithelial layers (RPE) (p=0.009) versus controls. Untreated patients with PDR also had diffusely thinned RPE layers (p=0.031) compared to controls.
Conclusions
Patients with untreated PDR exhibit inner retinal dysfunction, as evidenced by reduced contrast sensitivity and FDP performance, accompanied by alterations in inner and outer retinal structure. PRP-treated patients had more profound changes in outer retinal structure and function. Distinguishing the effects of PDR and PRP may guide the development of restorative vision therapies for patients with advanced diabetic retinopathy.