2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)64703-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunohistochemical Labeling for Dpc4 Mirrors Genetic Status in Pancreatic Adenocarcinomas

Abstract: DPC4 (MADH4, SMAD4) is a tumor suppressor gene inactivated by allelic loss in approximately 55% of pancreatic adenocarcinomas. Unfortunately, it can be technically very difficult to detect the inactivation of DPC4 at the genetic level because genetic analyses require the microdissection of relatively pure samples of neoplastic and normal tissues. This is especially true for pancreatic adenocarcinomas, which elicit vigorous, non-neoplastic, stromal responses. Immunohistochemical labeling can overcome this hurdl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
230
1
4

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 295 publications
(245 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
10
230
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Of particularly interest, 47% of PDC showed negative staining for the protein. DPC4 immunohistochemistry has been recently shown to correlate with inactivation of the gene in more than 90% of cases (Wilentz et al, 2000). This would provide additional evidence that homozygous deletion is a major mechanism of DPC4 inactivation in ductal cancers.…”
Section: T T G G T G T T G At G a C C T T A A T Tg Gt G T T A A T G Amentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of particularly interest, 47% of PDC showed negative staining for the protein. DPC4 immunohistochemistry has been recently shown to correlate with inactivation of the gene in more than 90% of cases (Wilentz et al, 2000). This would provide additional evidence that homozygous deletion is a major mechanism of DPC4 inactivation in ductal cancers.…”
Section: T T G G T G T T G At G a C C T T A A T Tg Gt G T T A A T G Amentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The inactivation of the DPC4 gene by additional mechanisms such as homozygous deletion was studied using immunohistochemistry, which has been shown to correlate with inactivation of the gene (Wilentz et al, 2000). All tumours were also presently or previously analysed for K-ras and p53 mutations and allelic loss at chromosomal arms 9p, 17p and 18q at sites linked to p16, p53 and DPC4 genes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22,23 Although the deletion pattern suggested a tumor suppressor telomeric of the gene cluster at 18q21, we chose to analyze the Smad4/DPC4 gene in more detail since exonspecific PCR primers were available and the described anti-serum for immunohistochemical labeling of Smad4/DPC4 has proven specificity and sensitivity for homozygous gene inactivation of 94% and 91%, respectively. 25 For Smad2/MADR2/JV18-1 and DCC, the correlation of immunohistochemical labeling and gene inactivation is unknown. In our series of classical midgut carcinoids, we did not identify mutations in exons 8 -11 of the Smad4/DPC4 gene, including the intron-exon boundaries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 If one allele of these genes is inactivated by mutation and the other allele by allelic loss, one would expect to see decreased or lost protein expression. We found a tendency toward a higher amount of lost expression of SMAD4, SMAD2, and DCC in tumors showing LOH compared with tumors showing no LOH at 18q21.1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%