2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcfm.2006.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunohistochemical distribution of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase (PDE) isoenzymes in the human vagina: A potential forensic value?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To our knowledge there is currently no conclusive test to distinguish between these three cell types. Several previous studies have examined differential carbohydrate and protein expression including the immunohistochemical detection of cytokeratins, estrogen receptors and phosphodiesterases but no unique marker has been identified [4,5]. One of the most promising techniques, first reported in the 1970s, was Lugol's iodine that identified vaginal cells by the presence of glycogen granules [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge there is currently no conclusive test to distinguish between these three cell types. Several previous studies have examined differential carbohydrate and protein expression including the immunohistochemical detection of cytokeratins, estrogen receptors and phosphodiesterases but no unique marker has been identified [4,5]. One of the most promising techniques, first reported in the 1970s, was Lugol's iodine that identified vaginal cells by the presence of glycogen granules [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Lugol’s staining method is no longer regarded as specific for vaginal epithelia as subsequent studies have demonstrated that glycogen‐containing epithelial cells can also be present in oral mucosa and male urethral mucosa (2–4). Previous studies have also investigated the differential expression of protein and carbohydrate markers but no unique marker has yet been identified (5–7). One recent study found that the application of a modified Danes stain showed different staining patterns for skin, buccal, and vaginal cells (8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%