2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0090-8258(02)00070-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunohistochemical and quantitative competitive PCR analyses of midkine and pleiotrophin expression in cervical cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
7

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
28
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…To explore the possible correlation between MK expression and tumour progression, we examined MK Figure 2A). These findings suggest a possible involvement of MK in pathogenesis and progression of pancreatic head carcinoma, as previously suggested for other carcinomas (Aridome et al, 1995;O'Brien et al, 1996;Moon et al, 2003). Using 75 pancreatic head carcinomas, we investigated immunohistochemically whether MK expression was associated with clinicopathologic factors including prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To explore the possible correlation between MK expression and tumour progression, we examined MK Figure 2A). These findings suggest a possible involvement of MK in pathogenesis and progression of pancreatic head carcinoma, as previously suggested for other carcinomas (Aridome et al, 1995;O'Brien et al, 1996;Moon et al, 2003). Using 75 pancreatic head carcinomas, we investigated immunohistochemically whether MK expression was associated with clinicopathologic factors including prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Ten fields were randomly selected, and expression in 1000 tumour cells (100 cells per field) was evaluated with high-power ( Â 200) microscopy. First, we classified the specimens stained by anti-MK antibody with a visual grading system employed for immunohistochemical evaluation (Moon et al, 2003). Samples were considered negative if less than 10% of the cells are stained for MK; weak was defined as 10 -25% of the tumour staining positive; moderate as 25 -50% staining, and strong as more than 50% of the tumour staining positive.…”
Section: Immunohistochemical Stainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past few decades, there was more evidence indicating the overexpression of midkine in tumor tissues or serum of cancer patients, such as oral squamous cell carcinoma [11], gastrointestinal cancer [12], colorectal cancer [13], hepatobiliary carcinoma [14], intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma [15], lung cancer [16], thyroid papillary carcinoma [17], lymphoblastic leukemia [18], cervical cancer [19], ovarian cancer [20], and prostate cancer [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Midkine plays critical roles in tumor development and progression through regulating cell proliferation [6], cell motility [7], cell survival [8], angiogenesis [9], and transformation of fibroblasts [10]. The messenger RNA (mRNA) and protein levels of midkine expression have also been found to be elevated in a variety of human cancers such as oral squamous cell carcinoma [11], gastrointestinal cancer [12], colorectal cancer [13], hepatobiliary carcinoma [14], intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma [15], lung cancer [16], thyroid papillary carcinoma [17], lymphoblastic leukemia [18], cervical cancer [19], ovarian cancer [20], and prostate cancer [21]. However, the clinical significance of midkine protein expression in breast cancer patients remains unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two investigators, who were unaware of the clinical information, examined all the stains independently. Midkine immunostaining was semi-quantified with a visual grading system in which the staining intensity was categorized as negative, weak, moderate or strong, similar to a previously reported system 9 . Samples were considered negative if less than 5% of the cells stained for midkine; weak was defined as <25% of the tumour staining positive; moderate as 25%-50% of the tumour staining positive and strong as >50% of the tumour staining positive.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Immunostainingmentioning
confidence: 99%